People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The above argument considers that there is a negative influence of emotions of the people on the decisions that they make for a given situation which according to me makes sense as these kinds of decision would be biased rather than being objective.
Lets consider an example in which king has to decide a punishment that is to be given to a person who was involved in a particular crime. If we consider that the person has helped the king in the past then king would have a soft corner for that person and would try to give least punishment to that person as he could. So this creates a biased predilection for a decision that is to be taken which is not good and this would encourage that person to commit crime as he would not get seriously penalized for the same.
Now some critics will argue that if the logic still pertains for the decision to be taken than whats the harm with that decision if it is based on emotion. First thing to note of this observation by the critics is that the logic is drawn out based on the emotion and the logic reasoning for that particular decision could be fallacious as well.
We could also consider a scenario in which the decision maker, Andrew, would render a decision based on his/her benefits and would ignore the decision that could be made to benefits the masses and give a specious reason for taking that decision later, which shows us the poor decision making skill Andrew has.
It is a wise saying that, "One should always think with brain rather than heart" so, based on above points, it can be inferred that people whose decisions are based on emotions rather than thoughts and they tend to justify their decision with logic are poor decision makers.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 23
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... biased rather than being objective. Lets consider an example in which king h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...d rather than being objective. Lets consider an example in which king has t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the least'.
Suggestion: give the least
...corner for that person and would try to give least punishment to that person as he could. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et seriously penalized for the same. Now some critics will argue that if the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...tains for the decision to be taken than whats the harm with that decision if it is ba...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecision could be fallacious as well. We could also consider a scenario in whi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or decision making skill Andrew has. It is a wise saying that, 'One shou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, then, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59415584416 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32606022377 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7276742559 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.875 118.986275619 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5 23.4991977007 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414537702042 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194286203295 0.0831039109588 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137694125803 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264060860382 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121364430459 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 14.1392134831 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.