All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The above statement states that company should not hire consultants and should rather spend time with their own employees to discuss strategies to improve the functioning of the company which is not in accordance to my view as it is better to take a piece of opinion from the outsiders rather than its own employees.
As we all know consultants are professionals and have many clients for which they work and this experience would help them to provide suitable suggestions to the company so that company can operate and function more efficiently. Consultants would have faced the same issue from its previous clients and would have resolved that issue so if the same issue is faced by the company, consultants can provide ways to tackle those issues which would be beneficial for the company.
It is also a good thing to get a view from the outsider as they can properly judge the issue with unbiased mind and provide a solution that is beneficial for all employees of the company rather if the company would spend time taking suggestions from their own employees than it may happen that they will give biased suggestions that would be beneficial for them rather than company. For example if we consider Google who develops Android Version and to test those versions it uses what is called Beta Testing, in which outside users test those version and report some issues if they have faced with that Android Version, so they basically take a opinion from the outsiders who are not their employees to improve their product that is Android before its official deployment for the mass users.
Now some may argue that it is waste of money to hire a consultant and rather those amount of money could be devoted for some other work that would be beneficial for the company which is fallacious according to me as the suggestions that consultants provide would be useful for a long run and would provide long term benefits to the company so its a smart investment for long term benefits. And some may also argue that employee would be well aware of the company so they would provide tangible and concrete suggestions to improve the efficacy of the company which might not be the case always as employees decision can be biased thinking for their own benefits rather than the company benefits.
So as the consultants have more experience and deal with variegated clients and employees decision can be sometimes biased it would be more beneficial for companies to hire consultants to improve their functions and operations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 23
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 59
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tsiders rather than its own employees. As we all know consultants are professio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h would be beneficial for the company. It is also a good thing to get a view fr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this version' or 'those versions'?
Suggestion: this version; those versions
...ta Testing, in which outside users test those version and report some issues if they have fac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Android Version, so they basically take a opinion from the outsiders who are not ...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fficial deployment for the mass users. Now some may argue that it is waste of m...
^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...de long term benefits to the company so its a smart investment for long term benefi...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits rather than the company benefits. So as the consultants have more experien...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85581395349 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55813530655 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.374418604651 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 23.0359550562 230% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8981401755 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 261.0 118.986275619 219% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.75 23.4991977007 229% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407488327554 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227577500973 0.0831039109588 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882362732104 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267462145318 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502340059956 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.3 14.1392134831 200% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 48.8420337079 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 12.1743820225 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 11.2143820225 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.