People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The decisions taken by people base on emotion in many situations is not correct. This might lead to make wrong decision. People should always consider the circumstances of that particular decision taken by them. Sometimes the decisions made by them in emotion cannot be justified.
For example if a boy who studies in the school and got less marks in some subjects made him fell that he is not worth of anything. In that situation with emotional mind he will take wrong decision like killing himself or cheating in upcoming exams and after taking this decision and when he cheats and got good marks in exam he will justify himself that he made is parents happy so it is fine to cheat in exam and get the good marks. In period of time he will definitely regret the same decision when he will be caught by invigilator while cheating in exam here he will definitely regret his decision taken in emotional stage. In same situation if he would have thought logically the decision is going to be good like he wants to study very hard and listen to classes to get good marks in upcoming exams. so here decisions made in emotional stage impacted the boys academics negatively.
Another example like if a terror attack happened in one country and that particular terror groups are situated in neighbor country so in the situation due to the emotion the affected country thinks that the neighbor country may have supported them and encouraged to make this attack and this emotion leads to the war like situation between two countries which leads to great disaster in all aspects. Instead of taking any decision emotionally one country should think logically what is the cause for this particular situation so that the decision will be like arranging a meeting with the neighbor country make them to destabilize particular terror group so here it is clear that the decision made in certain emotional situation may not be corrected in near in future. So one should clearly think abut the consequences and make any decision.
so while a person was in emotion mind will always force the person to make the wrong decisions so that he can get rid of emotion quickly and make him to justify that persons actions in future as they cannot change the decisions made by them in past. So a person who was in emotion have to come out of that stage and should think logically what are the consequences and should make the decision. so the people making decisions in emotion and justifying the logic later are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a boy who studies in the school and got less marks in some subjects made him fell th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...heat in exam and get the good marks. In period of time he will definitely regret the same deci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... his decision taken in emotional stage. In same situation if he would have thought...
^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had thought'?
Suggestion: had thought
...motional stage. In same situation if he would have thought logically the decision is going to be g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...es to get good marks in upcoming exams. so here decisions made in emotional stage ...
^^
Line 5, column 759, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... situation may not be corrected in near in future. So one should clearly think abut the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...consequences and make any decision. so while a person was in emotion mind will...
^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...annot change the decisions made by them in past. So a person who was in emotion have to...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...sequences and should make the decision. so the people making decisions in emotion ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73120728929 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47332162408 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400911161731 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.34640406 60.3974514979 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.466666667 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2666666667 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368970598499 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17500343763 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153685601684 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26875538488 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101650074606 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.