People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Yes, in most cases making decisions based on emotions result in a poor choice of possible lines of action, the emotion-based decision-maker tends to be infatuated by the situations at hand and are likely to make decisions that are assailable to reasoning and logic. But we cannot say that these emotion-driven decision makers are poor decision makers in all circumstances.
Consider a woman who out of compassion helps a poor child on the street with some money for food or some clothes, this action is based on emotions of compassion which she felt towards the poor child on the street and we cannot say that this decision was a poor decisions. If this decision is subjected to critical reasoning, we can see that this woman was in a capacity to help but if she went home first or took some time off to consider the possible logical reasons for her actions, it is very likely that she might not have come back to help.
There are cases where emotions can result in very bad decisions, consider the case of a man whose loved one left or bereft husband, this is a typical example of where emotions can certainly result in poor decisions, out of grievances, he could make a decision whose results will be detrimental. He might still be able to justify his actions with logic afterward but from a general standpoint, that might not have been the best decision.
In conclusion, although it is expected that logical reasoning should precede in the decision making process, we cannot generalize that people who make decisions based on emotions are poor decision makers, both poor and great decisions might result from these whimsical decisions. Also people's decision making abilities also depend on many other factors like experience which are not accounted for by emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decision'?
Suggestion: decision
...annot say that this decision was a poor decisions. If this decision is subjected to criti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... result from these whimsical decisions. Also peoples decision making abilities also ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90728476821 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68488125299 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506622516556 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0856767533 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.25 118.986275619 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.75 23.4991977007 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501639116997 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238695300976 0.0831039109588 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154825690994 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328224652612 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152570129868 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.