People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Quick and thoughtful decision making is an important skill which is required in today's world. A person skilled in good decision making thus has an extremely valuable asset which can help him tide through all kinds of circumstances on the account of his decision making skills.
Having stated the importance of decision making what really makes for a good decision maker?, On taking a closer look at a large number of successful people who can serve as a veritable source for our deductions on the issue, we would find out that a majority of such people today are attributed as successful purely based on their ability to take "objective" and rational decisions.
So what constitutes an objective decision or a rational decision?, Is it completely devoid of any emotion whatsoever? , Well to agree to this in full would be wrong whereas to refute it completely would be an even greater mistake. I would actually agree with the spirit of the statement in subject. Which means I do believe that "Overtly" emotional people over time do indeed prove to be poor decision makers specially those who on account of getting an unintended outcome as a consequence of their decisions try to justify their actions with some poorly contrived logic which doesn't hold much ground when looked under the lens.
If we gloss through history, it is replete with such examples of people for example let's take the case of white supremacists who held sway over the American population all the way till mid 20th century, when asked about the integration of black population by allowing Black and other Hispanic population being given equal rights and status as any white individual always used to block any such movements by falling back to emotional arguments(Emotional for the white population of their times) such as maintaining racial and religious purity in the whites by not intermixing with other races and falling back to religious arguments too which everybody knew did not stand the scrutiny even in those times. today as we all know how wrong those ideas were since giving more power to non-whites has helped America prosper a great deal and at an even increased pace in contrast to before. The World Wars being another extension of such a psychology which later on proved to be fatal for the entire humanity of the day.
Having agreed at length with the principle here i would maintain that the decisions taken by people which involve other people should not be taken by completely dissociating emotion since every decision has some collateral and when people are involved it is never intended that any human life should suffer as a consequence and a mean path should be taken.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- In a nation there should be a common curriculum upto college. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 65
- Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for company to operate more efficiently. If companies would spend more time listening to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sion maker?, On taking a closer look at a large number of successful people who can serve as a ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...etely devoid of any emotion whatsoever? , Well to agree to this in full would be ...
^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...whereas to refute it completely would be an even greater mistake. I would actuall...
^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... indeed prove to be poor decision makers specially those who on account of gettin...
^^
Line 4, column 590, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... with some poorly contrived logic which doesnt hold much ground when looked under the ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 704, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Today
...stand the scrutiny even in those times. today as we all know how wrong those ideas we...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...greed at length with the principle here i would maintain that the decisions taken...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'really', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221991701245 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.170124481328 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109958506224 0.0880659088768 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580912863071 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0331950207469 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143153526971 0.12292977631 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0684647302905 0.0406280797675 169% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80903674006 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248962655602 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.00207468879668 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.103734439834 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0207468879668 0.0249443105267 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0311203319502 0.0148568991511 209% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2690.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 452.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95132743363 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347345132743 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234513274336 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176991150442 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115044247788 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80903674006 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 65.2780140525 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 41.0909090909 23.380412469 176% => OK
Sentence length SD: 181.546934031 59.4972553346 305% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 244.545454545 141.124799967 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0909090909 23.380412469 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.674092028746 189% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 64.5422365245 51.4728631049 125% => OK
Elegance: 1.65873015873 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21063124676 0.391690518653 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126247986776 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0508977902208 0.077325440228 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.644429435571 0.547984918172 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.239474772429 0.149214159877 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085637395559 0.161403998019 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692493545191 0.0892212321368 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.239467804357 0.385218514788 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0491732434891 0.0692045440612 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136172765684 0.275328986314 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518787629902 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.