People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
People base there decision on one of the two things - emotion or logic. Neither of them is wrong, it entirely depends upon the situation's demand. However, to make a decision based on emotion and later justify those decisions with logic is a sign of a poor decision maker.
Tensions between India and Pakistan have been going on for decades, with hatred for one another on both sides. However, the politicians cannot wage a war on the other, succumbing to their hatred filled emotion. Here, they need to take their decisions based on rational, logic. They need to pragmatic. Further, their are situations where one needs to base ones decision on emotions. In the recent Syria crisis it would be completely logical and legal to not allow refugees into other countries, but the situation calls for an emotional decision - for the sake of humanity one needs to provide them shelter and support. Thus, the point being made here is to base one's decision on logic or emotion depends completely upon the situation one is in and none of them can be termed as poor decisions.
However, if a person bases a decision on emotion and justifies it with logic, then certainly the person is a poor decision maker. If one cannot stand by ones decision and justify it with emotion - assuming one had made the decision based on emotion - then certainly while making the decision the person was not sure about his decision. The person was equivocal, mixed up in multiple thoughts and not sure how to proceed.
One may claim that sometimes to convince society, that one has made the right decision, one may need to adhere to logic even if one had made the decision based on emotion. I would like to argue here that, if one cannot accept and justify the emotional reasons behind ones decision then it is evident that the decision made is faulty and inherently poor.
To conclude, to base your decision on emotion or logic according to the situation at hand and stand by the decision and justify it with the same reasons that compelled one into taking that decision is a wise thing to do and in no way one can term such people as poor decision makers. However, to base ones decision on emotions and then later justify it using logic showcases that one is unsure of what one is doing. Decisions made being unsure are always poor and hence such people can be termed poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...logic. They need to pragmatic. Further, their are situations where one needs to base ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s, the point being made here is to base ones decision on logic or emotion depends co...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209150326797 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.18082788671 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0718954248366 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0631808278867 0.0497285424764 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0392156862745 0.0444667217837 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115468409586 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0522875816993 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.35711399694 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0392156862745 0.030933414821 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00217864923747 0.0016655270985 131% => OK
Determiners: 0.078431372549 0.0997080785238 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0217864923747 0.0249443105267 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00871459694989 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2369.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 420.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64047619048 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.319047619048 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233333333333 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171428571429 0.200843997647 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0738095238095 0.132149295362 56% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35711399694 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 219.290929204 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42619047619 0.48968727796 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.7324277712 55.4138127331 83% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3333333333 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7756813078 59.4972553346 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.611111111 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.6666666667 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.33076923077 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330641190511 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.186412968144 0.123202303941 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123335938629 0.077325440228 160% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.576079167475 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180602819883 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152678090152 0.161403998019 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1229686172 0.0892212321368 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.450641973485 0.385218514788 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0656474140487 0.0692045440612 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250511846843 0.275328986314 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881515940522 0.0653680567796 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.