The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
The discussion on the main benefits of science advancement has long been of strong interest and debate. Some individual argues that advancement in sciences is to make chores less time consuming to perform. Hereby, increasing the amount of relaxation for mankind. On the contrast, some scientists will say, technological advancements are what make complex intrinsic theory more accessible to solve. Thereby, creating more time to be dedicated on the problem. The assumption of this essay argues that increment in technological advancement because more people have to relax in south Miami Beach or go for vacation in Hawaii. I mostly disagree with this that technological advancement are only meant for mankind to have more pleasurable time rather than deliberate on what to come, for 2 reasons.
Advancement in science has made unsolvable problems more realistic. New discovery creates an avenue for more research activities to be focus on. For example, the discovery of quantum dot in 2023 by Prof. Johnson, lay the foundation for the beginning of new branch of science on quantum dot field. Given that, this new discovery holds unknown number of values- whether good or bad, it causes for more time dedication to study what importance they hold. Even though the discovery makes possible for the developed of the novel anticancer drug, scientist is yet to ascertain the extent of toxicity, solubility or other drug ability or downside this new development may hold. Hereby, call for more time to be dedicated to this new field. In this example, the discovery of the quantum dot as the new most effective drug against cancer does not necessitate the creation for relaxation but rather create a new problem to solve. The one that require more time dedication to study the drug properties.
Likewise, technological advancement increases the productivity as well as income generated by a company. All companies want their work to progress. The main vision of a company is not to have downsides. The assumption of this prompt argues that because of the new development or technology a company made which allow exponential increase in the year revenue, necessitate them to relax and not work on how to improve on coming year revenue. For example, the discovery of land tractor makes farming easier, thereby increasing the amount of crops farmer can plant in a year and in turns increase the amount of income generated. Tin addition, this new discovery of tractor doesn’t mean the farmer will continue to have an exponential increase if the farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easier to do. Therefore, advancement in sciences do not create more time for relation, rather it creates more productivity time.
In conclusion, the assumption that technological advancement are primarily meant to create more time for relation is flawed. Rather, it unlock new horizon for science advancement, create new problem to be solve, and make the next discovery easier to come through. While researcher by Prof. Ade from Yale University state that the more technological advancement we have the more people have time to go for conference. This study do not mean that this new advancement hesitate them relaxing in this conferences. On the other hand, it shows how technological advancement can lead to better collaboration, development of new ideas and innovations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 58
- diversity statement 11
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 58
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...he farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'unlocks'?
Suggestion: unlocks
...time for relation is flawed. Rather, it unlock new horizon for science advancement, cr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 492, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...w advancement hesitate them relaxing in this conferences. On the other hand, it show...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2848.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17818181818 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93131059736 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450909090909 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 915.3 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2453023489 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252485549127 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843264296035 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720340249676 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193047635337 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627196979062 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...he farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'unlocks'?
Suggestion: unlocks
...time for relation is flawed. Rather, it unlock new horizon for science advancement, cr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 492, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...w advancement hesitate them relaxing in this conferences. On the other hand, it show...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2848.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17818181818 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93131059736 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450909090909 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 915.3 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2453023489 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252485549127 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843264296035 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720340249676 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193047635337 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627196979062 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.