Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinction every day. Some of these plants are used for the production of important medicine for mankind. Some are source of food in some part of the word. Some benefits are yet to be determine. Some have research that are underway. Should we let them go to journey of no return because it cost us money and jobs. The prompt of this essay says that living things that are not human whose saving can lead to financial break down should be allowed to go to extinction. I mostly disagree with these issue that we should only save plant that are cheaper to save, with three reasons below.
Firstly, extinction is not a trivial topic in these words. In fact, animals like dinosaur that where once dominating this world many years ago are nowhere to be found because of human activities. Some research output from university of Maryland on evolution biology early this year what able to predict that assuming the dinosaur which are no kore on earth what still in existence, their genome would have been use for the development of effective cure for cancer. A plant or animal species that do not really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. Should we now allow such plant to die off because we don’t know what benefits it hold later on. What if the species end up being the major source of income or major source of novel discovery later on. The finding of this research from Maryland shows that assuming human had opportunity to save dinosaur which are thought not to be of great benefit then, it would have led to great breakthrough in sciences today. These findings underscore the important of saving plant and animal regardless of whether they cost us money or jobs because we don’t know the benefits they hold in the future.
Likewise, there is need to maintain a balance in the ecosystem. Ozone layer for example need to receive the amount of air requires in a close circle. Allowing plant or and animal species to die because of our beneficial can disturbed the nutrient circle in the atmosphere and apparently affecting the ozone later. Research carried out by Prof. John from Yale, highlight that, if we save these species of organism we will have adequate amount of oxygen flow through the atmosphere, hereby reducing the heat that is causing the destruction of our ozone layers. This finding shows the important of saving them regardless of what benefits they hold to human eyes. Even though they do not yield financial benefits at hand, they save great function in protecting our precious atmosphere.
Nonetheless, some will argue that while was money on plant and animal species that do not yield revenue. But everything should not be based about the benefit at that particular time, what about the future.in addition, Have we consider whether the plant or animal will be useful in the future?, What if advancement of sciences leads to the development of tools that can help us access their benefit. I agree with the later- for a plant not to yield income now doesn’t mean it’s totally useless. Apart from that those plant and animal species are also of great important to the protection of our ozone later. In addition, for them not to yield income directly doesn’t mean they are not in any way beneficial to mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 90 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 70 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones 16
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 62
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
Latest research by cell report shows that many...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'researches'.
Suggestion: researches
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...test research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ource of food in some part of the word. Some benefits are yet to be determine. Some...
^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Some benefits are yet to be determine. Some have research that are underway. Should...
^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...t really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 671, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holds'?
Suggestion: holds
... because we don’t know what benefits it hold later on. What if the species end up be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in protecting our precious atmosphere. Nonetheless, some will argue that while ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2788.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 586.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75767918089 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39075270446 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453924914676 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 872.1 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3055921649 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10714285714 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205097794445 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605745069527 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359613254987 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142578674898 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330480385551 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
Latest research by cell report shows that many...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'researches'.
Suggestion: researches
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...test research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ource of food in some part of the word. Some benefits are yet to be determine. Some...
^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...Some benefits are yet to be determine. Some have research that are underway. Should...
^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...t really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 671, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holds'?
Suggestion: holds
... because we don’t know what benefits it hold later on. What if the species end up be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in protecting our precious atmosphere. Nonetheless, some will argue that while ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2788.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 586.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75767918089 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39075270446 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453924914676 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 872.1 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3055921649 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10714285714 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205097794445 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605745069527 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359613254987 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142578674898 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330480385551 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.