People are prone to search for the similarities when perceiving different objects to process easily the unaccustomed things in their brains. Grouping similarly might be called as the nature of human tendency. The different way of mental function between Westerners and Asians—whether analyzing the object, or trying to position the object within the whole topography—shows the habitual way of classification influenced by accustomedness. Even some kids who have not yet studied any formal education want to distribute their playthings with his/her consistent and peculiar traits—for instance, some boys will do their job according to the size, or other girls by their favorite color. Then what is the reason of such a systematic grouping?
Some philosophers say that human beings are deserted to the wilderness with nakedness. It means that we should resort to each other for our survival. As a matter of fact, the basic precondition of human society will be a unhindered communication with each other. Communication can be successfully attained only when people seek for some common interests with each other, ultimately demanding for the similarities. That is why many sociologists study people as the social level. This explication comprises of both psychological and physical need of human beings.
Of course, the similarity itself will not be a prerequisite of communication. If all the people have the same interests and knowledge, they do not have to talk with each other. Both of similar and contrasting viewpoints will lead us to communicate. People instinctively judges the others whether they can be beneficent to him/her or not. If they are not so helpful for his/her existence, the similarities will not be caught by the onlookers as attractive.
Individuality does not mean peculiarity. The premise of nowadays post-colonialism and ethics that all the differences should be respected does not mean to refuse shared intelligence but to have a renewed awareness of otherness. We cannot avoid comparison when speculating several similar-looking objects. That is the reason that context-based flexible norms should be added to human perspective. Pointlessness cannot provide us with the answer for the intrinsic value matters, for innateness is also affected by the surroundings.
In conclusion, we cannot shun our attention away from similarities among different objects. The singularity of a thing is not so idiosyncratic when perceiving such a trait being shaped by the context.
[³»±Û¾î¶§¿ä] - by P (2005/03/28) <ZEROBOARD
In asserting that we shouldn't compare anything to something else, the speaker fails to deal with the fact that there are many exceptional cases. In other words, the speaker makes too much of a generalization with this statement. Therefore, I generally disagree with it, although I partly accept it as true.
To begin with, I agree that a thing should be considered as it is. In our lives, we have a chance to give advice to somebody who has the same difficulty that we once had. We try to compare two cases and easily advise him/her with what was the best for us. However, each person is different from another so their priorities to make a decision are different. Also, what the person has trouble with seems similar to what we had before, but it could be mostly different from ours. In this case, as the spe0
- "Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make a 50
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 58
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 62
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...c precondition of human society will be a unhindered communication with each othe...
^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...e as the social level. This explication comprises of both psychological and physical need of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a trait being shaped by the context. [³»±Û¾î¶§¿ä] - by P 2005/03/28
Line 12, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...»±Û¾î¶§¿ä] - by P 2005/03/28
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...28
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...with it, although I partly accept it as true. To begin with, I agree that a thing...
^^^^
Line 15, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent from ours. In this case, as the spe0
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, similarly, so, then, therefore, even so, for instance, in conclusion, of course, as a matter of fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29739776952 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27196045691 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53717472119 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 874.8 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7441402867 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0625 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.03125 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169917801467 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464275797347 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370510845945 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751019761472 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407707819696 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.