"Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy."
The statement that celebrities have to prepare themselves being the center of attention is an undisputable fact which always overshadows their lives. Despite the right of every person to claim their privacy, people’s attention to their lives is inevitable.
First of all, Public figures, no matter politicians, singers or athletes have always been the perfect role model for ordinary people who wish to develop to higher positions in their lives and most of their attention is due to their curiosity of how their idols reached to this level of success. By following their role model’s life pattern, they believe they can strengthen the possibility to become a successful individual. Celebrity speeches about their difficulties they faced during their way of success, galvanize people, especially those who are experiencing really hard times in their lives. Therefore, these actions always showed to have a positive impact improving the hope of people who suffer difficulties.
Another reason is social media which reduced the distance between public figures and their followers considerably. Through applications such as Facebook, Instagram and twitter, celebs share even their most private aspects of life with everyone. Even if some of them didn’t intend to show what they are doing, persistent followers can immediately figure it out by comparing their pictures with other resources. In contrary to figures who don’t intend to make anything of their postings, there are celebrities such as the kardashians who gain most of their life’s income by advertising on internet and manifesting their private lives.
The private life of Public figures is not limited to social media and news. In cities like Hollywood there are reporters or paparazzi’s which are always ready to catch one of these celebs and capture pictures which is profitable for the reporters themselves.
Unfortunately, today, there are many haters which don’t really want success in their lives by following the ways celebrities experienced, the only thing is to criticize them and upset them. There have been many examples of magazines who revealed some aspects of the life of role models to disparage them. Instead of bringing logical reasons for their disapproval, haters only tend to belittle them to get rid of their own anger or take advantage by suppressing another party.
Due to this reasons, public figures have to expect these type of inspections in their lives. By being ready to face these immoralities, it will be easier for them to deal with it. The best thing that they can do is to inspire the people who really admire their ways and themselves and benefit a whole society from their experiences.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 63
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans tothink for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 66
- "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy." 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 8, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... suppressing another party. Due to this reasons, public figures have to expect ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, so, then, therefore, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34570765661 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84672119766 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524361948956 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2166837758 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286698318507 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101253847455 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564452782844 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154152067916 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768061752946 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.