“School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want.”
With the fast-paced world and rapidly changing technology, it a tedious task to keep oneself up to date with all the things. And with encroaching recession and greater number of people than number of jobs, one not only needs to familiarise but also become a virtuoso of the new technologies to be still in demand. And how should a student know which is the right course for him or her to pursue what they dream of? For this students turn to the web of knowledge-the internet.
Internet provides all sorts of knowledge but the true source of information is rarely known and thus, separating legitimate information from spurious becomes difficult. Students try to find out what knowledge do they need before entering into the real-world turn to the internet. They are swarmed with information, thus making it a strenuous task for them to choose the right path for themselves. If schools could incorporate what employers want, students would be in a better state to achieve their goal.
Moreover, all the information is not always available on the internet. You could easily get information on what corporate employers want but not so easily on what one should know to work in a research labs? Research labs are already under pressure to produce results as they rely on results for their funding and then they have to spend time and money on research assistants to teach them how basic work around the lab is done before they can actually help around to produce fruitful results. If the students were taught before-hand the basic knowledge, such as how to conduct surveys and studies, they would need then they would be more beneficial to them. Therefore, if schools taught industry relevant things, students would be more lucrative to the employers as they would not need to expend funds to train them.
But schools should not get carried by the suggestions and requirements of the employers. Students also need their fundamental knowledge to apply what they have learnt in the real-world. Employers can get demanding would prefer to inculcate all their training in the school curriculum to get reduce their cost. But this would only distract the students from getting their basic knowledge and would add to the burden. School policies incorporating employers’ wants should also be in balance with students' and teachers' wishes as students who are going to learn and teachers are the ones who are going to teach. Teachers should wish to offer such courses and the students should be intrigued enough about those courses to enrol in those courses.
The students should not just learn the theoretical concepts but should also know how to correlate what they have studied with the real-world scenarios. In my opinion, school policies should incorporate knowledge that the employers think students should possess but also should keep in mind the students' and teachers' preference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | denhoc91 | 39 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | new | 40 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Sivajeet Chand | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Sivajeet Chand | 50 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | PriteshAmrelia | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r her to pursue what they dream of? For this students turn to the web of knowledge-t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2411.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04393305439 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66227507003 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468619246862 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2895098607 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.80952381 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308443926919 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997695680629 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10145515353 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187402716424 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804168486155 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.