In my opinion, the discussion about whether schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities when school buildings are in need of repair should be considered in two situations. One situation is that if there are any other ways to get funding to repair school buildings rather than cutting the current funding for extracurricular activities. As we know, there are plenty of ways to get funding for schools. For example, the school could contact the alumni who already graduated to see if they may want to donate to help to maintain the place they used to play and gain knowledge at. Or the school could try to contact the community center or the local government to see if it is possible to get some funding from them. At the same time, the student organizations of the school could also host some donation activities, such as fetes, which encourage students to sell things that they have not been using for a while to someone who really needs them to help with the repairment of school buildings. By engaging students in funding raising would also benefit making responsibilities into practice for students.
Another situation is that there is no way to get funding from other resources rather than cutting the funding for extracurricular activities. Admittedly, extracurricular activities, like art, music are beneficial for students' holistic development, including physical, mental, and spiritual health. Lack of extracurricular activities may interfere with their social abilities, physical health, and in contract affect the performance in main curricular classes. However, the ill-maintained building is a safety hazard that will directly affect students' safety. With the considerations of actual needs, it is necessary the make the decision to use the funding for the extracurricular activities for building repairs. However, the students must be informed immediately since they are the people that would be most affected by any consequences. And it's essential to disclose it to students and their parents for any updates later on.
It will never be easy to make a straightforward decision regarding this circumstance because, after more consideration, it actually asks people to choose from the short-term effect versus the long-term effect on students' holistic health. The best scenario would be finding other resources of funding to repair the building rather than cutting the extracurricular activities in school as recommended in the first paragraph.
- Obesity was once considered a disease of adults however it is becoming increasingly common among children Why do you think this is happening What can be dome to help children stay healthy 61
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation and explain your rea 50
- All college students should be required to take math courses even if the students have no interest in math 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, while, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38917525773 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12528774316 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518041237113 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1952090115 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6875 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305181842868 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10568384974 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924366528746 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196031973967 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823462085371 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.