science is meaning less without religion
Science is the study of the fundamental elements of nature as well as their behaviour and the relationships between them that shape the universe as we see it. Science looks and believes in facts and continuous observations made over time. It does not follow or accept a theory which is based on belief or has no underlying proof.Science has lead to the growth of mankind into making life saving drugs and helps us understand our role in the universe. Whereas religion is based on beliefs many of which are yet to be proven. Religion is passed from one generation to another without much proof of the events that it states or the proof of the stories that it brings forward. Hence, it can be safely stated that the argument negatively links science with religion.
Science and religion have for most the most of human history been two different sides of a single coin. For example the scientific discoveries of Galilio led to his execution by the church. Although his work was a great leap forward for science but it defied the belief of the church that all planets and the Sun revolved around the Earth. This example states that new scientific discoveries are generally contrary from religious belief and cause a clash between them. Hence, Science is not meaningless without religion as religion takes time to understand the advances in science. Science has not yet come to a conclusion about the existance of a superficial character with great power(god) this clearly states that the paths in which religion and science walk are completely different and one cannot be related to another.
However, religion provides us with limitless ideas and imagination which inspire researchers in science. For example the reason Galilio looked towards the sky with his telescope was because he wanted to see whether the religious tale of all planets revolving around the Earth was true or not. Hence, religion provides us with the imagination and cautions us from taking the wrong steps which could harm mankind by illustrating them as stories.
Although religion provides the tools to imagine and explore new ideas science is not completely meaningless without religion. It has always been that science has played a major role in proving or disproving religious beliefs and new scientific discoveries are sometimes far from religious beliefs hence, it can be concluded that science is not meaningless without religion.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- science is meaning less without religion 50
- Science is meaningless without religion 50
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- most important characteristic of successful students 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Science
...ed on belief or has no underlying proof.Science has lead to the growth of mankind into ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g drugs and helps us understand our role in the universe. Whereas religion is bas...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ideas'' or 'idea's'?
Suggestion: ideas'; idea's
...es the tools to imagine and explore new ideas science is not completely meaningless w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, for example, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05513784461 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6659222207 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486215538847 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7570654839 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.647058824 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290230182649 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110059011259 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965436411141 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200866602932 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915308635202 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.