Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Today's world is a very competitive one. Competition is unavoidable due to the quantity of talent. Everyone aspires to be the best, whether in academia, athletics, business, or politics.
This can be beneficial in some cases, but quality suffers as a result. This is particularly true in high-level competitions. Students' desire to succeed prompts them to put their education at risk.
Parents and educators continuously encourage their children to excel in all of their classes. Students are taught in a time- and syllabus bound structure, which restricts them from obtaining knowledge and insight on issues of their choosing. Those seeking a deeper understanding of a topic or situation are demotivated by the evaluation pattern. Only their score is taken into account, which often necessitates memorising. Prioritizing cramming and copying will inevitably lower the quality of learning till the secondary levelCompetition also aims to reinforce one's determination. It takes a lot of time and effort to become an expert or proficient student in the area or disciplines studied. One of the requirements for a high math score is the ability to solve arithmetic problems.
In addition, you must ensure a positive grade point average. Because it is one of the factors used to determine a student's value to a company or a college. Your school grades indicate your ability to learn and how hard you work. Thousands of people applying for jobs at Samsung, for example, must first pass a similar examination. A 3.0 GPA is required to be eligible for a university scholarship.
If students have more precise goals, they may be better able to focus on their studies. Many young students who lack a definite study strategy and hence cannot focus on their learning to do their best in otherwise abandoned capacity building may be inspired by good grades in a variety of common courses.
While competition may deter certain underachievers, it is often advantageous to students' development in terms of anticipating future circumstances and creating definite goals. I disagree with the speaker's claim in general. To determine if grade rivalry is harmful to learning, one must disregard the value of future assets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more Cmportant than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the business manager of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all 59
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 62
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings Discuss both sides and give 50
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fits and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food sto 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...levelCompetition also aims to reinforce ones determination. It takes a lot of time a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in general, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25141242938 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09946226747 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.296907161 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8260869565 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3913043478 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0746989889342 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0177196827817 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029329916693 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334616141892 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355041038479 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.