Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
The best way to increase the organization productivity is by incorporating several ideas which will be benefited for the employees.
I completely agree that seniority should not only be the basis for employee compensation, instead it should be on the basis of their qualification and work performance.
Present generation, the organizations are keenly looking towards the company benefits, which can be achieved by fulfilling the needs of the employees. The best way to do this is by praising their work and giving employee compensations and these rules must be applicable to every employee of the organization.
By adopting this method in the organization, each and every employee will start giving his best to complete the given work on time expecting the promotion and merits. Ultimately the productivity of the organization will also increase. If the seniority is made the basis for the employee compensation then lot of people do not think of even perusing the graduation and directly join the organization which will affect the productivity of the company.
For instance if a company having a employee(manager) who is having around 15 years of work experience and a engineer having 5 years of experience doing the same work, then obviously company will look towards engineer to give him employee compensation than that of manager who will be earning more. Organization always look towards company benefits.
Thus, Work performance and merit should be the criteria for the promotion and employee compensation instead of seniority, by incorporating this organization will achieve sustainability in terms of financially and productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | Sruthi Bheemineni | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Shrija Sheth | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | fresky | 40 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Rakshick Shrinivas | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | abyz123 | 58 | view |
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.Discuss the extent to 50
- Davis Technologies, a computer-chip maker, could solve its problem of declining sales by dropping its prices. This would make Davis better able to compete in the highly competitive computer chip market. The sales of chips would increase and this would sub 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ny. For instance if a company having a employeemanager who is having around 15...
^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... around 15 years of work experience and a engineer having 5 years of experience d...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609375 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29801335501 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.730197148 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.8 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32385751453 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135620354217 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1328058509 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198061209599 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131693523149 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.