Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The idea of providing additional training to those with special talents is an intricate one. Some believe reinforcing special talents of some children at an early age will further help develop their talents. However, identifying children with special talents in society and providing them with training will lead to advantages and favoring of some individuals and an unequal education.
First, providing extra training to those with special talents will be more advantageous to some than others. Imagine, a child coming from a higher socio-economic class than most of her peers and she excels in gymnastics. Her parents have the resources and savings to provide her with further training to develop her skills. If the same child was from a low-income household, they may not have money to spare to help pay for this additional activity. This distinction will build a path for favoring a part of society over another because these individuals have more time, money, transportation, contacts and more. In the end, some child will be unable to attend training for their special talents because they simply do not have the resources.
Furthermore, allowing additional training to those with special talents could demonstrate an unequal distribution of education. Take into consideration the little girl from the lower-income family that cannot expand her skills in her special talent of gymnastics because she is unable to provide the money required to put her through these peculiar and rigorous training courses. This will lead some children to build a stronger foundation for their future compared to others and in other words helping some children reach their full potential while others cannot accomplish their goals because they cannot afford them. Consequently, an unfair system will develop which will help some succeed more than others.
Finally, some may argue this practice will help children reach their full potential. For example, if the child is more advanced in physics compared to others in his class, providing him with training at an early age will help develop his math skills and he could someday be the world’s greatest physicist discovering an important theory. Although this is true, it does not show the extreme side of the spectrum, which could lead to disadvantages to others.
Though the reasons to identifying children with special talents has valid points, these claims do not outweigh the opposing side. This system will allow for the favoring of individuals and an unequal education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 79 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | luljaime | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 38
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...gs to provide her with further training to develop her skills. If the same child was from ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32418952618 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69340537189 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456359102244 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5549898138 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.611111111 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30586405405 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117880672863 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757368892959 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204394287419 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795655055393 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.