Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Talent is born with the person and is a great gift that one can use in life. In fact, some talents are developed at an early age but some might not even be identified and never develop. The prompt recommends that society should identify talents at an early age and invest on their training. In my opinion, I agree that talent is like a plant that should grow when it’s time for that, and society should put effort on identifying talents and provide training to develop them.
To begin, there is a difference how societies invest on identifying talents and provide training for them at an early age in order to keep this talent growing. Thus, talents in economically and politically developed populations are luckier than those in less developed ones. For instance, Albania, a post-communist country had many talents that with opening from the long isolation gave them a chance to succeed in other European societies. Consequently, during isolation, these talents were identified in Albania but they weren’t offered the right training. Nowadays, even though Albania is not isolated, its low economic growth still does not support talents at the same level like other societies. The above example, illustrates how politics and economy, have the power to value talents and invest on them. Talents are the pride, the fame and the gateway to be known internationally.
Further, even if talents assume that path to success is not easy, they should invest on that and take chances to live the dream of being successful and famous. For example, sport talents that are identified at an early age, need to come a long way through engagement and motivation to enjoy the results of their talent. Someone may have a good voice but training and time will come handy to use. History has shown the big turn somebody’s life takes when talented and invested. History shows the impact of success in peoples’ lives and those around them.
Of course, some argue that a society investing on talents has good indices to progress. However, isn’t that precisely why talents should be invested on even though some societies can’t do much like the others do. Even though talents get identified, they need to be given the right training and support and they need to work hard. There are many links that hold the bridge of success for talented people.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- A society should instill to its young people the sense of cooperation and no competition 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...dentifying talents and provide training to develop them. To begin, there is a difference...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92405063291 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53898429996 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513924050633 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5910393021 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.25 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365954027741 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125859590816 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092177620486 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252819237813 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101800702389 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...dentifying talents and provide training to develop them. To begin, there is a difference...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92405063291 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53898429996 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513924050633 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5910393021 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.25 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365954027741 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125859590816 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092177620486 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252819237813 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101800702389 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.