Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your

Essay topics:

Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position

For a society to truly advance and flourish in all segments, it is essential to identify and provide adequate training to those children with special talents from an early age.

Statistics show that children from the age of 5 to 12 have a heightened capacity to learn new skills and improve upon their existing innate talents. Therefore, it is very essential that young children who have special talents in any field be identified and given the chance to hone these skills. Proper training from an early age will ensure that these innate talents are developed under the careful supervision of experts of the respective fields. This will ensure that the children grow u to be masters of their respective skill.

These days we see a herd mentality of students to take up a profession which is commonly chosen by their peers. They do not consider their aptitude in other professions or fields and more often than not prove to be average or above-average professionals. Careful identification of talent and aptitude at a young age and proper guidance will ensure that they have an idea as to what is their strength and what other options they can pursue in life. If mong every 100 students, 50 take up engineering, 30 take up humanities and the remaining 20 engage in medical or armed forces, the society would have a very constricted generation of professions. Instead, if children with special talent in the field of gymnastics, soccer, sculpture, ballet et cetera are identified at a young age and are given proper training in their respective fields, they will grow up to be highly trained and expert professionals who will exude confidence and help other young children get in touch with their skills. This process in urn creates a robust society where variation in professions would ideally result in a dynamic and evolving society.

However, it is a very well known saying that no two children are alike. Every child is special in his or her own way. Thus focusing on special training for one, and having the other go through regular curriculum, may cause the latter child to be underconfident and unsure about his abilities. This could in turn prove detrimental to the overall morale of the entire generation where we would have a rift between different children on the basis of how they are treated. It is thus a well-liked opinion that up to a certain age all children be given the same amount of education and exposure, and then when they develop a certain sense of confidence and self-identity, they can choose their preferred vocation.

Although the latest point seems valid for a lot of people, I believe that identification and supervised honing of talents from a young age has far better prospects for the society as a whole.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-18 guozhishan 58 view
2024-02-13 Tammy__kk 79 view
2024-01-10 luljaime 50 view
2023-10-30 qwertyy 83 view
2023-08-19 shrreya 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user qwertyy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 934, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fessionals who will exude confidence and help other young children get in touch w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88034188034 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74963056776 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7619849148 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.352941176 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5294117647 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286936565132 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915333621927 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779704935075 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183979056199 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819822695351 0.0667264976115 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.