Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others

People have different opinions toward each other regarding successful leaders’ criteria. One ‎group believes that a leader should be highly competitive in government, industry, or other fields ‎to succeed. However, others argue that he or she should be collaborative with others. I mostly ‎align with the second group for two reasons: collaboration brings various perspectives and mutual ‎advantages. Nevertheless, I do concede that, in some cases, being competitive can motivate ‎leaders to succeed. ‎

First of all, cooperation can bring different points of view on a specific project. These various ‎opinions can be productive as they view one subject from many angles. Otherwise, a person, ‎even one not narrow-minded, could see only from one side and subsequently assumes that he ‎will be successful if he follows his path, which most probably leads to failure. Moreover, ‎collaboration with others brings different skillful people around the table. As people are not ‎perfect, they mostly lack some skills or sufficient knowledge in one case; on the other hand, ‎others have more experience in this subject. They can act as a complimentary and resolve others’ ‎difficulties. Therefore, collaboration can lead to success for a leader due to bringing various ‎opinions and skills into one place.‎

Secondly, cooperation can improve and promote a healthy relationships with others. For instance, ‎an independent nation may face some dilemmas due to geographic restrictions. In this case, ‎foreign policies play an essential role by initiating the export and import of goods between two ‎countries. This approach can be beneficial for both nations as it helps fulfill their promises in ‎developing countries. Furthermore, a leader can promote their country by working with another ‎nation and reaching an agreement. For instance, one goal of some countries is to expand their ‎visa-free territory to ease the application procedure and encourage more people to visit their ‎country. This can be one goal for a leader if he wishes to promote their culture or earn money ‎from tourists. Hence, collaboration can be considered a requirement for a successful leader.‎

However, in some cases, competition can motivate a leader to work harder than usual to bet ‎others. For example, the industry can see other organizations and set a goal in order to reach or ‎even supersede them. This approach could arise from differences in prices, innovations, and ‎other tasks. By searching for different ways to earn these aspects, a leader can be motivated to ‎work around the clock and set a goal. In addition, even if this competition ends with a failure, a ‎leader acquires new skills and a set of mind to restart the combat. Finally, this healthy competition ‎drives a leader to be able to overcome difficulties in different stages of his leadership. Thus, in ‎limited cases, competition can be Benefield as it encourages the leader to try harder.‎

In conclusion, a successful leader should regard collaboration as a necessity as it brings various ‎opinions, skills, and mutual benefits. Nonetheless, healthy competition can be productive for a ‎leader to be successful.‎

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... should be collaborative with others. I mostly ‎align with the second group for two reas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relationship'?
Suggestion: relationship
...ation can improve and promote a healthy relationships with others. For instance, ‎an independ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2754.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53012048193 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26736384896 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524096385542 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9647518847 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374606390516 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120140378909 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077893214781 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248841987697 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08500904319 0.0667264976115 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.