Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as

The balance between corporate social responsibility of corporations and their prime focus on profit generation is highly debatable nowadays. While big companies aim for revenue generation, they should not forget about social side of their business activity that affects brand image. Personally, I consider that the corporations have to desecrate sixty percent of their activity to profit making and the remaining forty – to caring about the community where they function. To elaborate more ion this issue, the for and against arguments will be presented in this essay.

Many big companies impair their reputation by causing harm with their activity to environment as well as providing employees with inadequate working conditions. Resulted from this, their profitability declines because of little social value they produce. For instance, the brand image of Nike has significantly suffered from the protests of its employees in Bangladesh. The people who worked on manufacturing fabrics of the company rebelled against low salaries and harmful conditions of the environment they worked in. The incident became worldly known and the company had to spend extra money for satisfying the demands of the protestants. This case proves the importance of corporate social responsibility for every big company and the major threats when it is not accounted.

The opposite side of company’s value is represented by its financial orientation. Of course, the main purpose of every business entity is its revenue generation, and even the social value that was discussed above has less importance for company’s founders. Except of selfish eagerness to make as much money as possible, higher profit positively impact state budget. The more profitable a firm is, the more taxes it pays to the government and, consequently, the more social benefits a population can get from this money. For example, the system of state social support is strongly developed in the countries with large corporations, primarily, in the United States, Germany, France, Nordic countries. Therefore, the financial value of any firm not only provides its founders with the resources for future growth but also compounds a noticeable part of a state budget.

Personally, I support the idea of partial distribution of company’s social and financial values. As for any enterprise, the main focus of a corporation has to be on its financial performance, while with the sufficient funds it can provide its workers as well as community members with satisfying salaries, working conditions and environmental activities.
To conclude, it is extremely difficult for every enterprise to decide whether it needs firstly consider its social activity and afterwards financial one or vice versa. I agree on the idea of value distribution when the main orientation of a company is on its financial performance and the ability of social support derives from the available financial resources.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...cial values. As for any enterprise, the main focus of a corporation has to be on its finan...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, for example, for instance, of course, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2509.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49015317287 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05433308294 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512035010941 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2413627321 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.45 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.85 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111861851776 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365809553105 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380526911126 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660203104516 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489832405328 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.