Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yeild to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
There are some people who state that leaders should alter their initial political credos and qualify them by public views in order to enhance efficiency; however, some other individuals arguing that they should retain original principles and do not deviate from them for the sake of compromise. From my point of view, an effective leader should adapt themselves by new circumstances and try to satisfy public demands.
The initial reason for supporting the idea that political leaders should deem public attitudes in their decisions and have plans to stray from their principles is changing conditions. By passing time, country’s conditions have been changing in terms of political, economic, environmental and social issues. Therefore, it can be probably impossible to remain these principles. Public satisfaction is the most significant issue that leaders should ignore or modify their principles to meet it. An effective leader should be flexible because some changes are inevitable and utilizing specialized rules and beliefs to bolster the situation may be inefficient.
Secondly, the insistence on remaining principles may lead to dictatorship which is one of the most fundamental confrontations between dwellers and leader. Setllers should profoundly believe that their dwell in democratic country which is one of the most important factors to increase public contributions. In this case, not only the productivity and effectiveness should be boosted by citizents, but also leaders can provide all facilities to reach their targets. These outcomes can be gained by modifying some small changes in principles and avoide the persistence of using exclusively them.
However, the idea of overlooking some particular principles by leaders and alter them based on public interests is criticized by some dissidents. They assert that leaders should stay on their principles in order to manifest their decisiveness and power. If they supplant new principles instead of the previous ones in order to consider the public opinions, they will presumably put on some serious difficulties. For instance, this behaving can expose their power to danger and opposing groups can misuse this deficiency to diminish their power. Hence, not only the efficiency may not be enhanced by this flexibility, but also this situation can lead to some inappropriate and even enormous changes in their politics which is need adequate time to be stable and thrive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | bashirheidari | 83 | view |
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 11
- Employers should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 11
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 83
- What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions. 77
- Do you? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54787234043 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97685042749 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5870052912 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29864318271 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105216881528 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535067577569 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199808828361 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316725717516 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.