Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res

Essay topics:

Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Some people think that continuing to enhance in technology developing could refrain the human interaction abilities. Others people, however, argue that not only the technology does not reduce the interaction among people, but also it result in produce a fast and immune way to communicate among human. I agree with the latter statement and present the following Reasons to support my point of view.

First of all, I would like to mention the invention of the internet causes to institute a lot of virtual groups, associations, corporation, and whatnot in which its duty is to make a relationship between people. From a different angle, maybe a person who used the internet a lot inside family seems aloof but actually, he or she is in another world that has a lot of persons to touch them. In Addition, changing in way of communication in the modern world is obvious; in past, you couldn’t touch a person far from you, but now you can communicate a person in a spur moment in a different continent, buy an instrument in the online website which they delivering it to you. Therefore, the more advancement in technologies, the more communication abilities for everyone in the world.

Second, in the past, while the technology is not prevalent, everyone learns difficultly other languages which that means a rigid constraint in the international communication. Fortunately, with a processing in computer science we can learn languages, take courses, even take languages tests at the home and online, it is absolutely amazing that you don’t waste your time for communication in a realistic manner.Since, this modern technology has some dangerous aspect such as children affected by porn site or encountering with plus eighteen context that sometimes harms our children, hacking your personal computers and disseminate your privates that can with good management is be absolved. Furthermore, with social media, internet messengers, blogs, dating websites, and so on you can touch with extended family or your friends who are in other countries in a few seconds. Thus, you cannot compare modern world methods in terms of communication with the past.

You might argue that, with the virtual reality modern world which the internet is created it, plus to our own one dimension past world, we have 2demision world that is more extent than the past one, has a more people to speak, work, play, and so forth to communicate them. However, family needs an adequate moment to spend time together for solving your problem and requires. Others might cite, the increase in the use of modern communicative devices such as smartphones, tablets, phones, and faxes in our world to incur depression and aloofness in families. But, we don’t remember overuse of every device in home cause problems. Therefore, universities and schools are commitment to instruct and edify the young people to how to use the modern device correctly.

In summary, I believe, any development in science and communication accompanied with a manual for it. Therefore, I strongly support that technology play a paramount role in providing us efficacious approach to communicate and connect each other.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
Suggestion: results
...e interaction among people, but also it result in produce a fast and immune way to com...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instituting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: instituting
...on the invention of the internet causes to institute a lot of virtual groups, associations, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ication in the modern world is obvious; in past, you couldn't touch a person far f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a realistic manner" with adverb for "realistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...pos;t waste your time for communication in a realistic manner.Since, this modern technology has some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Since
...for communication in a realistic manner.Since, this modern technology has some danger...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ivates that can with good management is be absolved. Furthermore, with social medi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19455252918 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99640455361 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54280155642 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.209963033 60.3974514979 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.333333333 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251348294936 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766006314162 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505705162017 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149392001507 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572247871394 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.