Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some people believe that it is human's responsibility to save endangered species, as they live in the same world with us and it is our fault to accelerate the speed to extinguish. However, some people argue that we shouldn't spend a lot of money rescuing every plant and animal species, since there are many other things that we should take into consideration like education in order to build a harmonious world. In fact, I think that people are supposed to protect endangered animals but don't sacrifice other important aspects which also need fund.
There are many reasons for people to save endangered species. The first is that without human activity, these endangered species may live longer and the group may be greater. It is the development of industry break the ecological balance between human and environment. In that case, the atmosphere is impaired so that plants and animals may have difficulty to adapt to the new world, which leads to their population decreasing. In order to make up the tragedy, some people built organizations to save endangered species, appealing to the whole society to work together to protect them despite the expense to humans in effort, time and financial well- being.
Despite people make an effort to save them, they may still disappear. As it is mentioned before, if the environment change, the animals and plant are ought to change themselves to adapt to the new environment. For example, human activity makes the world warmer than before, which does harm to the polar bear living in the pole. That't because as the temperature rising, they will lose their home and have problems in preying fish. Some polar bears choose to mitigate to the norther place in order to find a colder place, while others who are reluctant to move go to death because of the lack of food. In conclusion, some species' population are gradually declining, which is a natural regulation. No matter how bigger contribution human make, they will die out eventually.
Another reason why I disagree with the statement that human spend a lot to save the endangered species is that there are many other aspects that the society should pay attention to such as education, medicine and technology. If most money is invested in protecting animals and plants, how about the children who couldn't afford to go to school, how about the poor people in underdeveloped country to make a living.
In conclusion, I think people as well as some green organizations can do their best to save the endangered species. But, if the whole society pay too much attention to the protection, it will do harm to the human society as other aspects have insufficient money and effort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 90 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 70 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 66
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 58
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ish. However, some people argue that we shouldnt spend a lot of money rescuing every pla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...posed to protect endangered animals but dont sacrifice other important aspects which...
^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... and plants, how about the children who couldnt afford to go to school, how about the p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9314159292 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69057385721 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1928025944 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.315789474 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347104359809 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947240042733 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717437169472 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188987216048 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354727356547 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.