Role models are individuals whom people, regardless of age, admire and aspire to emulate. The reasons for selecting role models are diverse, ranging from their perceived personalities to their career achievements. Many young adults consider sports and movie stars as their role models, with the expectation that they exhibit humility and responsibility to serve as positive societal influences. However, this expectation doesn't necessarily impose an exclusive requirement on them to conform to the standards of model citizens simply due to their professional compensation.
Primarily, sports and movie stars have achieved their current status through substantial effort and dedication. It would be unreasonable to mandate that their role modeling responsibilities hinge solely on their remuneration. Instead, they should be encouraged to embody positive qualities to contribute to a well-functioning society, particularly given the substantial number of youths and children who regard them as inspirations. In a recent interview, Ronaldo, a prominent sports figure, revealed that his abstinence from drugs and alcohol was influenced by his father's struggles with alcoholism. Such personal convictions have the potential to dissuade young adults from substance abuse. Consequently, these individuals should embrace the role of exemplary citizens based on their intrinsic beliefs, rather than external compensation.
Moreover, sports and movie celebrities frequently garner significant media attention and can become the faces of societal campaigns. It becomes disheartening when their actions contradict the causes they champion, undermining both their careers and the advocacies they endorse. For instance, Jussie Smollett, an American movie star known for advocating LGBTQ+ rights and racial equality, faced scrutiny and admitted to fabricating an incident. This not only tarnished his professional standing but also detrimentally impacted the campaign he championed and innocent parties involved. These celebrities don't merely represent themselves; they hold revered positions in society. Thus, any behavior contrary to their endorsed causes can severely compromise positive societal progress.
While some argue that their substantial compensation warrants good citizenship, it's important to note that their earnings are a result of their accomplishments. Consequently, enforcing an additional obligation solely on the basis of their income isn't warranted. This perspective also acknowledges that movie stars and sports figures are entitled to personal lives; however, they should remain mindful of their behavior due to their influential status among diverse segments of society seeking to emulate them.
In conclusion, role models, particularly those in sports and the entertainment industry, play a crucial part in shaping societal values. The expectation for them to embody virtues like responsibility and integrity is rooted in the potential impact of their actions. Although not compelled by their financial rewards, these figures should recognize their capacity to effect positive change and, in turn, contribute to the betterment of the broader society.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 54
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 16
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 62
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...l influences. However, this expectation doesnt necessarily impose an exclusive require...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ent parties involved. These celebrities dont merely represent themselves; they hold ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ion solely on the basis of their income isnt warranted. This perspective also acknow...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07349665924 5.05705443957 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14120412538 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592427616927 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0063011566 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.954545455 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267773176152 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794911382363 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600414138039 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163270961783 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504097596081 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.1639044944 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.38706741573 131% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 100.480337079 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.