The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There are over 200 countries in the world today. With this huge amount of nations, how can we determine the great ones from the ones that are struggling? There is a debate about what metric should be used to determine great nations. Is it how well the nation caters for its citizens or is it the giant strides the nation’s citizens make in different facets of life? The prompt suggests that the surest indicator of a great nation is by the general welfare of the people and not by the achievements of its citizens. To this, I agree and I am going to expatiate my reasons in three paragraphs.
Firstly, the fundamental duty of any nation is to provide for the welfare of its citizens. The reason why governments were created in the first place is to create a body that will pull the resources of the people and channel it towards the provision of an acceptable level of quality of life. Hence, if any nations fails in its primary duty of providing for its citizens, how can we call such a nation a great nation? The effects of not fulfilling the primary duty of ensuring the general welfare of the people is rippling. For instance, if a government does not provide adequate educational welfare for its citizens, it will lead to a rot in the society as brilliant minds will become mediocre and will be unable to contribute to the advancement of the nation which will eventually lead to the collapse of the nation. Hence, we can infer that if a nation does not provide for the general welfare of its people, then they cannot be great.
It was recorded that during the pinnacle of the Roman Empire, cities around the world always feared the citizens of the Roman Empire because they knew that their government cared about the welfare of every citizen of the Roman Empire. In fact, it is said that if a Roman citizen was physically hurt by any city, the city could be invaded by the Roman army and questioned for their actions. Such was the length at which the Roman Empire cared for the welfare of her citizens. Knowing this, we can infer that the strength of the Roman Empire was not the only factor that made the empire great as they were not the only nation known for their prowess in battle, but the length at which they were willing to ensure the general welfare of their citizens was distinguishing. Therefore, a nation can only be considered great by both her citizens and the outside world when it is evident that she cares for her citizens. In today’s world, nations like the United States of America have infiltrated many foreign bases with Special Forces to rescue a distressed citizen, this is why they are considered one of the greats today.
While some might argue that great nations in history have all been remembered by the exploits their citizens. For instance, the Greek empire is remembered by the sagacity of its citizens such as Archimedes, Aristotle and a host of other scholars. However, will these individuals have reached the heights they reached if they were running for their lives as a result of insecurity in the land? Will they have been able to think of the great principles they discovered if they were plagued by hunger? If the welfare of the people are taken care of, there will be room for outstanding performances by the citizens. The greatest nations have exemplary citizens because they provide for the general welfare of their citizens.
In conclusion, when a nation provides for the general welfare of her citizens, it leads to display of distinction in different fields. Therefore, the bench mark for a great nation should be how well she is providing for the general welfare of her citizens as it is the catalyst that leads to achievements. No matter how many achievements are won by the citizens of a nation, if the nation is not habitable because of poor welfare, the nation is a failed state.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 78
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- All facts should be considered false as they can be changed in the future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are considered one of the greats today. While some might argue that great nation...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...are considered one of the greats today. While some might argue that great nations in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 33.0505617978 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3165.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 680.0 442.535393258 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65441176471 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10654576214 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52887092371 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391176470588 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1013.4 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2355508129 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1851851852 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198582715113 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744456499938 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070809974546 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135753077203 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563218017372 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.