This topic raised the issue whether the remuneration of a teacher should be based on his learner’s academic results. Indisputably, students performance depends on the ability of the teaching of the instructor. Nevertheless, it doesn’t indicate that the teacher’s salary would be based on the student’s result. Therefore, I mostly disagree with the assertion and will elucidate my stance further.
First of all, an educator is said to be the pathfinder of a learner. It isn’t easy to be an instructor. You have to be educated enough to be a teacher of a school or college. Most of the teachers are recruited by the authority based on their merits and experiences. Their salaries are defined in accordance with the pay scale. Their job is to educate people. A teacher may be very efficient but if his student doesn’t do his homework rigorously and doesn’t seat for the exam, then that student is sure to fail. Here the educator has done his job properly, but the student didn’t.
Moreover, If a student is very talented and hardworking , he does his studies very well by himself. His teacher may not provide sufficient guidance to him. The instructor may be careless in his job. Despite that the student can do great in finals all by himself. So, here no credit goes to his teachers.
However, a teacher should always be responsible for his students performance whether it’s bad or good. For good performance an educator’s efficacy should be praised. On the contrary, he should be questions for the bad results of his learners.
In conclusion, aforementioned examples don’t constitute any support to claim the connectivity between teachers’ salaries and students’ performances. Although, a teacher is responsible for the learning of a student, it doesn’t necessarily assert that teacher’s salaries should be congruence with the student’s evaluations.
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for t 55
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 16
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure 54
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects f 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling r 37
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...student is very talented and hardworking , he does his studies very well by himsel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21782178218 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13918353261 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6598057226 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8636363636 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7727272727 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327793442165 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102838668389 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661165193052 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1997065519 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075137776963 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...student is very talented and hardworking , he does his studies very well by himsel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21782178218 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13918353261 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6598057226 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8636363636 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7727272727 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327793442165 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102838668389 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661165193052 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1997065519 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075137776963 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.