Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance
The job of a teacher is one of the most sacred and selfless professions one can aspire to have a career in. It is a job which requires immense knowledge, drive and creativity as no student is same and requires individual attention and handling. The idea of altering the salaries of teachers' on the basis of the performance of their students will not be beneficial by any means.
A scenario where the compensation of teachers is on constant supervision will actually lead to a very unstable work culture among teachers. Teachers will feel very stressed out because of this as they will be required to meet a certain performance threshold related to the students they teach leading to a very unhealthy psychology among the teachers and students. For example if a teacher somehow observes that the performance of his students are not at par with the required norms of the institution or if the teacher wants his salary to hype up a bit then he may even consider unfair means to grade his students, leading to a very retarded educational culture.
Performance of students should not be considered to be dependent only on the performance of their teachers. There are numerous other reasons for a certain performance level of the students. This strongly suggests the idea that altering the salaries of teachers only will lead to no good in most of the cases. Consider a situation where the management of an institute somehow admits students who do not have enough prerequisites required for the course then it is unfair to judge a teacher on the basis of performance of such students.
Such kind of fear may even prevent teachers from experimenting and altering away from traditional teaching ways and will end up sticking to the same old tested and trusted not interactive ways of teaching. No doubt that it will reduce languid behavior among teachers but we will be achieving this goal at a very high cost of a very sloppy and static teaching standards.
This kind of analysis and constant nagging will also put teaching as a profession in bad light as not being a stable and appropriate occupation for those who have been investing immense time, research and study in a particular field. Therefore such a performance analysis must not be encouraged as they will be doing more harm than good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | ajonna | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Usama148 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | wenye | 50 | view |
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 75
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 66
- a nation should require all its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college 66
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ider unfair means to grade his students, leading to a very retarded educational c...
^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...search and study in a particular field. Therefore such a performance analysis must not be...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85496183206 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81735813827 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483460559796 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.878254398 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244298831904 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105284957876 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977040519264 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148834461827 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072869456589 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.