Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The issue raises a controversy whether or not it is necessary to determine teacher's salaries based on their student’s academic performance. Each side has its strengths and weakness. Although I agree with the issue, there are some reasons for which teacher's salaries should not base on their student's performance.
First of all, teachers will become better teachers if their salaries are based on their performance. If a student gets a low grade and the salary of the respective teacher is reduced, then teachers will be more attentive in preparing their course material. Also, teachers might be started the personal care of this student. Besides, he will be started to motivate students to be more attentive.
On the contrary, teachers cannot be accused of the low grade of their students. Recently, in Bangladesh, such kind of program is implemented in a school to judge teacher's attentiveness in their work. Despite of hard and soul trying of teacher, letter mark getting rate is only thirty percent. Furthermore, if the students are not self-motivated, then good grades cannot be expected.
Finally, if teacher honorarium will more for the great performance of their student, then they will more motivated than who are not gain this allowance. Most of the schools pay teachers based on their seniority. Because of this when teachers become old as well as lose their mental and physical energy and their teaching activity gradually decreases. For increasing their enthusiasm for teaching there is no such better program than it.
On the whole, teachers should receive their honorarium based on their student performance. When they pay for their student's performance, they will motivate to take care of their students properly. Nevertheless, sometimes teacher's educational background, teaching experience, seniority should consider determining the teacher's honorarium.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | bashirheidari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans tothink for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 43
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 16
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue raises a controversy whether or not it is necessary to determine teachers s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...akness. Although I agree with the issue, there are some reasons for which teacher...
^^
Line 17, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter program than it. On the whole, teachers should receive their honorarium...
^^
Line 17, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...niority should consider determining the teachers honorarium.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, kind of, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93683702787 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52397260274 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4339684589 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445799167572 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172320896453 0.0831039109588 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114723383608 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292609160202 0.150359130593 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999358061856 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.