Teachers’ salaries should be determined based on students’ academic performance.
The writer of the issue states that teaching wages should be premised on the outcome of pupils’ quality. Although a substantial number of individuals believe that teachers play a significant role in enhancing the students’ knowledge, and thier income can be set by it, others have opposing views and argue that some other features affect this calculation. I am inclined to believe that it will be unreasonable if the calculation of the salery limits merely by this aspect.
The primary reason that supports my idea regarding the fact that faculties should have variable capabilities which are inextricably bound up with their amount of salaries. Firstly, the level of their knowledge is undeniable. A well-educated teacher have a deep insight of science, thus, a wealth of information can be instructed to students. Furthermore, another effective factor is experience. A well-experienced teacher may be a well-behaved one and have sufficient information about the method of teaching, answering the questions, describing, illustrating unfathomable issues and encouraging pupils to do best.
Besides this idea that teachers’ wage should be commensurate with their abilities, the other essential reason is being up-to-date. Utilizing the latest technologies, modern methods, online resources, new equipment in classes and social networks for communications have a remarkable impact on the value of teachers.
However, according to research undertaken by a prestigous world-renowned university, students’ performance is the most fundamental principle to define teachers’ revenue. This research shows if the proportions of wage hing on students’ results, it will benefit both of them. Teachers try to enhance productivity and efficiency in their classes which leads to increasing awareness and knowledge among students. Moreover, lazy pupils or those who have abundance difficulties in their studies will be galvanized by their teachers to engage in class activities.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the determination of teachers’ income by considering only the pupils’ qualification has some deficiencies and it requires some more aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | bashirheidari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
- Do you think driving and voting for youngsters below 25 year old is necessary? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. In your own experience, is it a positive trend? 77
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 77
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- It's difficult to maintenance the balance between work and other aspects of life shush as family and leisure time, what is your opinion to keep it balanced. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92682926829 5.05705443957 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49525364414 2.79657885939 125% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8763911924 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30943107041 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978131249834 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831957926859 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175670003351 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513621986231 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.1639044944 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.