Teacher’s salary should be based on their student academic performance.
Teachers are the people who give the direction for students toward the success. They are the bridge between student’s labor and success. Diligent and continuous working and guiding the student for success make them venerated toward their students. However theirs salary based on performance of students is not logical one. To support my view, i explain following reasons.
Firstly, if the salary will be provided according to the student performance, every student in the class might get the higher grade form the teacher because grade is only measure which determines the student’s performance. Teachers might not work hard to get higher salary rather they give higher grade to students. For example, in one school, if this recommendation will be applied, teacher would directly link their salary as per the student performance, hence, rather than enhancing the student ability, they will rank the students with higher marks. When taking competition with other schools of same standard, students cannot make success. Even the morality and ethics do not prefer him/her to do this work but every teacher wants to get adequate salary to overcome their own expanses. Hence if this recommendation might be applied, the student will able to pass with greater marks but unable to get success in future by the failing in entrance examination of higher school level. Hence, this recommendation should not be applied, however, teacher's salary should be based as per their qualification and performance them and how they satisfy the students.
Further more, Applying of this recommendation prevents them to teach with curiosity and passionately rather unmotivated him toward his work and might leave the school later. This is because the reason that this plan is highly depend on the students. The students are not of same nature. Some might grasp the learning materials in short time and they are diligent and hardworking too. However, other is lazy and with the several instructions by the teachers, they might not progress in study. These students might hinder to greater evaluation of teacher performance even if teacher works hard to enhance their ability.
In conclusion, this recommendation in act might give negative effect on students and teachers performances. Perhaps, this will have adverse effect on the enrollment process because the loss of qualified and honest teacher and low quality student. Hence, to make the school famous and protect from defame, this recommendatio is avoided
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | Yash S. Patel | 50 | view |
| 2018-12-30 | Yash S. Patel | 50 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | AyBen | 50 | view |
| 2016-12-27 | abhigna batchu | 50 | view |
- Revenue Sources and Expenditures of a USA Charity in one year, 2016.Task 1 Sample - Revenue sources and expenditure of a charityTask 1 Sample - Revenue sources and expenditure of a charity 11
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Teacher’s salary should be based on their student academic performance. 50
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e them venerated toward their students. However theirs salary based on performance of s...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...is not logical one. To support my view, i explain following reasons. Firstly, i...
^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowing reasons. Firstly, if the salary will be provided according to the studen...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...in the class might get the higher grade form the teacher because grade is only measu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... salary to overcome their own expanses. Hence if this recommendation might be applied...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...Some might grasp the learning materials in short time and they are diligent and ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34683544304 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76022519627 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475949367089 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6218914027 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368005355778 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114235382342 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108634259386 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212614556265 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12818518519 0.0667264976115 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.