Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teacher’s salaries should be based on their student’s academic performance. That is to say, they must work hard to get good grades from students. I bolster this statement; by doing so teachers will foster students to get good grades which will result in burgeon in their grades. This will help teacher to get good or high salary as an accolade.
Firstly, this practice will help teachers to take their jobs seriously and by doing so it is blatant that students grade will also increase because most of the time it is observed in all schools or collages that, teacher don’t care about students grade they are just concern about completing their portions.
They don’t even ask students have you understood the topic. To give an illustration of what I mean, There are several municipal schools and colleges, this school and colleges give free education to poor people in such colleges and school most of the time teachers don’t care about the students grades they just hustle to complete the portion. This can be stop if all teachers’ salaries are based on student’s grade.
Secondly, there are some teachers who are very good at teaching. They banal some topics so each and every student should understand so it is blatant that majority of their student gets good grades. Such teachers deserve good salary which they don’t get. So it is fare to give salary to teacher by considering their students performance in exam. For instance, in most of the school and colleges there are few teachers who seriously cares for their student’s good feature such should be lucrative.
Due to such kind of teacher’s student’s grades burgeons.
Finally, if this practice is carried out than I think it will help student as well as teacher to develop. Because teachers will give their best in teaching and it is blatant that students will understand easily. Which will help them to perform good at exam and their grades will also increase. For example, if teacher teaches student with everything she has got than students will also perform well in academic. This will lead to bright feature for students and teachers as well.
In conclusion, teacher’s salary should be based on student’s academic performance is a good idea to brighten the students feature and this will bring justice to those teacher how teach by heart to give proper knowledge to their student’s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...get good or high salary as an accolade. Firstly, this practice will help teacher...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 162, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this teacher' or 'those teachers'?
Suggestion: this teacher; those teachers
... feature and this will bring justice to those teacher how teach by heart to give proper knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve proper knowledge to their student’s.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i mean, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01256281407 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54314180953 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43216080402 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 73.5842884045 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246194071663 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109216812694 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785525710912 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146748952702 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537159081095 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.