The true test of greatness of art work is the ability to understood by the masses.
Art is a skillful work which can only be expressed by unique people. This work has its own features that are accurately visible for the creator eyes. It cannot be judged by the normal people who lacks inherent skills to analyze the art work. So, I strongly disagree with the given claim that true test of greatness lies in the most people understanding. Art is very different work compared with the perfunctory work of people who does stereotypical work. There is no chance for them to understand the art clearly to appreciate the art done.
Admittedly, Art is a precious piece of knowledge that is acquired only by few people. Not everyone can shine in the field of arts. Likewise, not all can understand the meaning of art to find it greatness and enjoy it. For example, A sculpture designed by a sculptor can able to find the minute flaws in it. And even the great goodness can be viewed entirely by him. A visitor just came to have a look on that sculpture have no intellectual thought to describe the sculpture's features. Rather, he would sight see the statue for some time for its wonderful making but not able to understand its features completely.Therefore, I would say that it is difficult for an unknown person to acknowledge an art work for its greatness.
In addition, I would prefer to keep an another state of example to make my point more clearer. Consider the seven wonders of the world which includes The Taj Mahal of India. There are people from many India who are not interested to visit The Taj Mahal in their country but willing to visit the Paris for Eiffel tower.Hence, the people of masses differ but experts can judge correctly.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for every one to recognize the art work as soon as they see it. There are many people who shows less interest in the art. By stating this point, i would clarify that it is not needed to be understood by a huge mass to evaluate the greatness of a art piece. Since, these masses may contain both contradictory minds of people such as critics and appreciates. However, There may be another set of group interested in art and these people are not creators of art but has ability to observe and judge the art work. These type of people has a greater sign of taste in art and can find the true essence of the art work. Even though these group of people belong to the same masses it is not required to test the greatness of art by taking all the entire mass into account.
In sum, I feel that the given claim is not valid to support positively. Moreover, the experts of art and the people with real skill to scrutiny the art work is more than enough to decide the greatness of art work. To make my view more stronger, I mentioned the different types of people contained in the mass. It is very unfair to take the views of different groups of people to test the greatness of art work.
- The true test of greatness of art work is the ability to understood by the masses. 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products. "Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where res 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...e to understand its features completely.Therefore, I would say that it is difficult for a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 37, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a state' or 'another state'.
Suggestion: a state; another state
... In addition, I would prefer to keep an another state of example to make my point more cleare...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: clearer
...other state of example to make my point more clearer. Consider the seven wonders of the worl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ders of the world which includes The Taj Mahal of India. There are people from ma...
^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun India seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
... Mahal of India. There are people from many India who are not interested to visit The Taj...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ing to visit the Paris for Eiffel tower.Hence, the people of masses differ but expert...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 179, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rest in the art. By stating this point, i would clarify that it is not needed to ...
^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... huge mass to evaluate the greatness of a art piece. Since, these masses may cont...
^
Line 13, column 647, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... find the true essence of the art work. Even though these group of people belong to the sam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 231, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
... greatness of art work. To make my view more stronger, I mentioned the different types of peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52198852772 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57071707749 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449330783939 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0167925867 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5925925926 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3703703704 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62962962963 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331830687275 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971132341672 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901888479652 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194592423102 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125689706033 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.