Important characteristics of a society refer to a whole lot of its aspects like cultural, financial, religious, social, dietary and eating habits and many more. Rather than studying the major cities, it will be more beneficial to study the towns and villages as an ensemble to know and understand a society due to the reasons and scenarios as mentioned.
Major cities, due to their vast job and livelihood opportunities, attract various kinds of people from all across the corners of the society. While this might result in cities consisting of people from various cultures, they will eventually start accustoming to the new urban culture in rather short while in order to cope up with the fast paced city neighbourhood. Consequently, the actual outset of the people living will be belied and often will be different from their origin cultures. Furthermore, they even start to develop new habits which are a blend of their innate and the new urban styles.
Moreover, cities with their congested and often commercial outlook will dampen the pastoral cultures gradually and eventually resulting in none whatsoever. People often get trapped in the factitious lifestyle often foregoing their previous cultural habits. Such a transition by means is to be blamed on anyone for that matter; it is just the way things turn out. There are however some exceptions to this and can be ignored for statistical purposes.
Additionally, the financial statuses of people in cities are more idiosyncratic and often disparate. Most of the working and earning class of cities with middle range income often consider cities to be a temporary location and thereby live with a entirely different status as they are originally capable of and are back in their native areas. Further, such middle range class constitute most of the urban population adding to the false imagery of characteristics of a society. Studying the social aspects will also be a biased study since cities with their humongous population and vehicles is simply a mammoth job to maintain the social infrastructures such as roads, parks and even the air quality and the concerning authorities often shirk in them and this clearly is not the actual characteristics of the society.
On the other hand, if towns and villages are considered as an ensemble, the characteristics of society can be patent with people living there having a more stable and free lifestyle. As a result, the local cultures and rituals preserve and flourish. Even the financial status won’t differ much among people from a particular town or village; the local infrastructures are well maintained due to the ease of handling. All these scenarios reinforce the perspective that studying towns and villages would be a more worthwhile to discern a society.
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 16
- Integrated essay from ETS official guide to toefl test ''Doubts on Rembrandt painting" 73
- "Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time." 16
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...characteristics of a society refer to a whole lot of its aspects like cultural, financial...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...emporary location and thereby live with a entirely different status as they are o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17477876106 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90740879186 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2481925576 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.944444444 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105998380169 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350970246638 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311447151788 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642095440908 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339489047733 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.