Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
it is often said that history repeats itself, whether big or small history has been replayed again and again in ways that would surprise some. leaders would do well to study the past and learn from history's successes and failures.
Certain events seem to play themselves out continuously over and over, the German philosopher Nietzsche called this Eternal Recurrence. this is perhaps most easily exemplified in the saying "Never invade Russia in the winter." In the past two centuries, two massive and up until that point unbeatable armies, Napolean's grande Armee and Hitler's Wermacht, both met their demise at the hands of the brutal inhospitable Russian winter. Now not every leader deals grand military strategy and the fate of history weighing on their shoulders, a good leader will study the past regardless. they should look at leaders who bear honorifics such as "The Wise" or "The great" and see what they did to earn those titles. We can even go less grandios, if you're the manager or team leader in a company you should make it a priorty to looks at your predecessors and acestain what made them successful or unsuccessful leader.
A good leader is forever a student of history. Rarely is a problem ever truly unique. look back into history and odds are someone has been in the position as you. learn from that. what made them succeed? what made them fail? How can you improve on what they did? Many great leaders were themselves fascinated with history. The Emperor Claudius was himself a historian before donning the purple and he took what he learned and ushered Rome into a Golden Age after decades of neglect from his predecessors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | zzk81 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 83
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 75
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity forpersonal growth. Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupiestoo much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often said that history repeats itse...
^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...again in ways that would surprise some. leaders would do well to study the past and lea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...etzsche called this Eternal Recurrence. this is perhaps most easily exemplified in t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... leader will study the past regardless. they should look at leaders who bear honorif...
^^^^
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...itles. We can even go less grandios, if youre the manager or team leader in a company...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Rarely' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: Is Rarely
...leader is forever a student of history. Rarely is a problem ever truly unique. look back ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Look
... Rarely is a problem ever truly unique. look back into history and odds are someone ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learn
...omeone has been in the position as you. learn from that. what made them succeed? what...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...n the position as you. learn from that. what made them succeed? what made them fail?...
^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...earn from that. what made them succeed? what made them fail? How can you improve on ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00355871886 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59795251643 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658362989324 0.4932671777 133% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.391420728 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.875 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6875 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469141849085 0.243740707755 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.013746111858 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0218776511539 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0297628987545 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00893820962355 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.