History repeats itself - this is a trite running down to us from centuries. If this is assumed to be true, then current events do face similar situations from past thus we can always look up to the conclusions of actions of people from the past and learn from it thereby producing an efficient solution. People in leadership position cater to a larger population and hence is expected to not falter in taking any decision. And in order to understand human behavior and make astute decisions it is important for draw useful and relevent insights from historical events. Hence I disagree with the statement .
Today's political system has evolved from monarchy or dictator based system to democratic system. To understand the pillars of democracy and to get the essence of its functions, it is important to look back at events that lead to democracy and its fundamentals principles. For a leader to run it efficiently, it is important to not repeat mistakes that were made in the past and look at improvise on leadership behaviors that were successful. To understand this, Mahatma Gandhi followed non violence to fight British rule as he had understood that weapon of violence will produce more turbulence in the society than democracy, he drew this conclusion from various attempts at gaining democracy from Britishers by leaders of the past like Rani Laxmi Bai, Bhagat Singh and many more who chose violence as a way out of the Brithish rule.
History is rife with examples of people drawing learnings from the past leaders to enhance their leadership. Some people may however argue that experience and astute morals also plays a crucial role in leadership and they are sufficient to make for a good leader. Thiss can be true in cases where leadership is as simple as say being a teacher. A teacher will through experience gain enough expertise to deliver the teachings. Therefore the definition of leadership also plays a role in proving the statement as completely false.
To conclude, it is desirable for leaders to look back once in a while, learn from mistakes of the past look produce better decisions.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 80
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...levent insights from historical events. Hence I disagree with the statement . Toda...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 605, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nts. Hence I disagree with the statement . Todays political system has evolved ...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ugh expertise to deliver the teachings. Therefore the definition of leadership also plays...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95774647887 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74150854325 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569014084507 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.499829584 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11430004307 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467996803555 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416491736853 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699893012166 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330477757182 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.