In contemporary society, the emphasis on creating an appealing image has indeed gained prominence, and while I agree that this trend can be problematic to some extent, it is essential to recognize that the issue is multifaceted and not entirely negative.
On one hand, the statement is accurate in highlighting how the proliferation of appealing images, often portrayed through social media by celebrities and influencers, can have adverse effects on individuals. Firstly, these images can contribute to a pervasive sense of inadequacy and depression. When people constantly see images of seemingly flawless bodies, extravagant lifestyles, or material possessions, they may start to compare themselves unfavorably and feel discontented with their own lives. This can lead to low self-esteem and a constant pursuit of an unattainable ideal, causing harm to mental well-being.
Secondly, these appealing images can oversimplify the complexities of human existence. They can create unrealistic expectations and pressure to conform to societal standards. People may feel compelled to emulate the lifestyles and appearances they see, even if it means sacrificing their authenticity and values. This can lead to a homogenized and shallow culture where individuality is sacrificed for the pursuit of an idealized image.
However, it is important to consider that not all aspects of prioritizing image over reality are detrimental. Appealing images can serve as sources of inspiration, motivation, and creativity. They can spark innovation and encourage people to strive for personal growth and improvement. Moreover, the visual and aesthetic aspects of life are essential for art, culture, and even personal expression. Images can convey powerful messages, raise awareness about important issues, and bring people together through shared visual experiences.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge that the overemphasis on creating appealing images in contemporary society can have negative consequences, it is crucial to strike a balance. We should be cautious of the potential harm such images can inflict on mental well-being and the simplification of human existence. However, we should also recognize the positive aspects of visual culture in inspiring and motivating individuals and enriching our lives through art and creativity. It is essential to cultivate a critical and discerning approach towards the images we encounter, separating the pursuit of authenticity and personal growth from the pressures of unrealistic standards.
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8252688172 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28787398348 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4988776528 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.388888889 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159737227164 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549773323144 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482610473804 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100278748321 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320732955713 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.1639044944 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.