Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Universities should require students to take courses from different fields as it would be beneficial to both the students and the society as a whole. It can be beneficial to the student because it will help them thrive in this increasingly multidisciplinary dependent world and it would be boon to the world as people can come up with solutions to the problems which were not solved with knowledge only in one field.
First, in the present world, it is highly impossible for a particular field to survive without depending on other fields. One such example is the field of Robotics. Robotics is a culmination of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science Engineering. And if we look at the applications of Robotics in today's world, there are innumerable applications that didn't even strike mankind a decade ago. If a student who is studying Mechanical Engineering is required to take a few courses in Electrical Engineering and a few other courses in Computer Science Engineering, the student would very well be equipped to go into the field of Robotics after Graduation and excel in the field without many hiccups.
Secondly, the possibility of creating an innovation is very high only if a student is exposed to the courses from different fields. In the past, inventions were possible even if a person had a very good knowledge only in one field. But the present scenario necessitates interdisciplinary knowledge to create an innovation. For example, let us take the case of Autonomous Electric Cars. The concept of Autonomous cars wouldn't have been possible if it was not for the combination of Mathematics, Computer Science, Mechanical Engineering and
Electrical Engineering. Mechanical Engineering deals with the Structural Strength of the Car, Electrical Engineering deals with the power supply, and last but not the least, Mathematics and Computer Science deals with the autonomous behaviour of the car. It is because of this technology that the burden of riding a car will be reduced by manifold and the safety of the ride will increase in leaps and bounds.
Having said that, it may not always be the case that requiring students to take courses from different fields would be beneficial for them. In fact, they can be a distraction. This is because there are a few fields that would require a deeper knowledge of only that particular field to make breakthroughs. In this context, one cannot overlook the field of Astronomical Physics. Only a person whose mind is completely submerged in the field of Astronomical Physics will come up with new and fascinating findings. Compelling such students to take courses from other fields like Management or Banking will only cause hindrance to their actual field of study.
Hence, it would be very beneficial for the students and the world as whole if Universities necessitate the students to take courses from different fields as the world is increasingly depending upon multidisciplinary tasks, it would be very easy to come up with an innovation that would benefit the world in ways that were once thought unsurmountable.
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatl 59
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms of ces and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in the wo 73
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 62
- Hydrogen based fuel cell 76
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling r 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...there are innumerable applications that didnt even strike mankind a decade ago. If a ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ic Cars. The concept of Autonomous cars wouldnt have been possible if it was not for th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uter Science, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering. Mechanical Engin...
^^^
Line 11, column 168, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rses from different fields as the world is increasingly depending upon multidisciplinary tasks, it would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2611.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14990138067 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09234867963 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418145956607 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4981994691 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220953368574 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708244892387 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074064774847 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130428654377 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722476635724 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.