Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study is a controversial issue. While there are potential benefits to a more interdisciplinary education, I disagree with the idea of mandatory requirements and believe that students should instead be encouraged to take courses outside their field of study based on their individual interests and goals.
On one hand, incorporating courses outside of a student's field of study can broaden their knowledge base and provide a more well-rounded education. Students can develop critical thinking skills and gain a deeper appreciation of the interconnectedness of different fields. For example, a computer science major taking a class in philosophy may gain a new perspective on the ethical implications of technology.
However, mandating these courses could have several drawbacks. One such issue is that mandatory requirements may lead to a sense of obligation rather than a genuine interest in the subject, leading to an ineffective and uninterested learning experience. Additionally, requiring all students to take courses outside their field of study would force students to take courses that may not align with their goals or post-graduation plans, resulting in a waste of time and resources.
Instead, students should be encouraged to explore courses outside their field of study at their own discretion. Universities can offer incentives for this, such as making classes outside of the student's major count towards general education requirements or offering scholarships for students to pursue an interest outside of their majors. This allows students to choose courses that are relevant to their interests and goals, making them more engaged and effective learners.
In conclusion, while incorporating interdisciplinary education can be beneficial, mandating every student take courses outside their field of study has numerous drawbacks. Instead, universities should encourage students to explore courses outside their field of study based on their individual interests and goals to create a more invested and effective learning environment.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73684210526 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26261443827 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479876160991 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0443604774 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.538461538 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325427759965 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15077527477 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114803480218 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226848787175 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849123335008 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 48.8420337079 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.