We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The statement whether we learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contracdict our own is a controversial On the surface, it appears that we would learn a lot by associating with people who have same opinions as our own as it would be easy to work with them and there won't be a waste of time in contending each other. However, a deeper look at the topic reveals that actually we can only learn something new or profound from people whoes views differ from our own view. The primary reason behind it has to do with the fact that associating with people of same opinions won't broden our horizons. We won't learn anything new from what we already know. On other hand, people holding opposite or contradictory view can impart us knowledge or give us vision to visualize the problem at hand from a different presepective which may reveal a new insight in the subject.
The field of science and technology has progressed immeasurably owing to the great work of our scientists and engineers. If we look at the underlying causes of some important innovations and breakthroughs, we would find that great work came from those who looked at the nature from unorthodox viewpoint. For instance, the classic discovery by Galileo that the Earth roates around the Sun contrary to the firmly held belief that the Earth was the centre of the universe and everything revolved around the Earth. The people of the Church were adament to their view and instead of discussing Galileo's viewpoint rationally they sent him to a jail. However, some prudent scientist working on astronomical observations studied the argument of Galileo without any personal bias and they found that indeed Galieo's theory was correct. Physicists of that time even used Galieo's theory to explain other phenomena such as why planets revolve in an elliptical fashiion. This examples shows that we can get new insights from a person holding a different view from us. Further, one has to be open minded to opinions from others otherwise even if the opponent is correct, we won't be able to gain anything.
Not only in science but in businesses also we find that people with un-orthodox opinions are the creators of novel products. Take for example the case of Steve jobs. It was by his creative imaginations and the power to forsee future in a manner different from others that made him the CEO of one of the biggest companies in
the world. He invented the concept of touchscreen smartphones and manifested this concept through his product called iPhone. No-one at the time could have imagined that people can operate a phone by touching their fingers on the screen. Those who accepted the ingenuity of Steves idea benefited as well. Today we see a plethora of smart-screen phones in the marked. The button mobile phones are a history now.
In sum, we do learn a lot from people holding different opinons than ours simply because they give us a different way to look at the problem a hand which could enlighten to come up with a novel solutions. However, it is also true that we have to have an open mind set in order to dervive benefit from the contrasting view points otherwise a blanket of dogma can bound our imaginations to a limited area.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-10 jha 66 view
2019-11-24 faatir 50 view
2019-11-11 Dhruv_gre 50 view
2019-08-03 kayp312 66 view
2019-08-03 kristheysus 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user plant2311 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we look at the underlying causes of some important innovations and breakthroughs,...
^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey found that indeed Galieos theory was correct. Physicists of that time even us...
^^
Line 3, column 1133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o opinions from others otherwise even if the opponent is correct, we wont be able...
^^
Line 3, column 1194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rect, we wont be able to gain anything. Not only in science but in businesses al...
^^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e CEO of one of the biggest companies in the world. He invented the concept of to...
^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed iPhone. No-one at the time could have imagined that people can operate a phone...
^^
Line 6, column 195, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...could enlighten to come up with a novel solutions. However, it is also true that we have ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2676.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7615658363 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61533636384 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501779359431 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2298437564 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.347826087 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4347826087 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17391304348 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360952945992 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092864126918 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935799062399 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186256391849 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126773113606 0.0667264976115 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.