We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To begin, people sharing similar view can discuss the topic with more interest. It is likely that people who have similar views discuss many things with interest within. For example, if a person is talking about geography and many people feel geography is a boring subject and just study to get through it in the exam. But when this person find another earth liking enthusiast then hey might talk for hours about earth and its properties. But if a person who does not like geography is talk to the person who is fond of it may find it difficult to begin or continue a conversation. For the example it can be seen that similar view or liking for a same subject enables people an opportunity to discuss more. Therefore, there is a chance of talking about the unknown things.
Second of all, If people of opposing view talk with each other there may be a chance that it can turn into a debate or an argument. When people having different views talk and express opposing views it is difficult for one to support another’s view. For example, One person 1 support one political party 1 and another person 2 might support another party 2. When ever they both discuss about their supporting parties both are busy in expressing their views to win the argument but they do not bother to listen to others views. This example can used to understand how different views can create havoc and trying to learn an issue from other point of view is not a problem for most of the people.
Finally, sometimes it is said that different view can confuse the genunity of the topic and smilier view might help us to understand the point precisely and develop a better understanding or learn new things with interest. For example, a person who is interested to watch basketball takes met a basketball player. They both have a liking toward basketball, therefore they may have a lot thing to ask and tell. But if a person who does not like basketball meet a basketball player he might not be interested to attest start a conversation. Thus, similar views can develop a conversion in first place that lies as a base for knowing new thing.
Although there are many supporting the statement, there is a possibility that people with different view might learn new things while debating to prove each other’s point. Let us assume a hypothetical situation in which two people are participating in a debate and one have to convince another and make him support his point of view on the topic whether children have to ge given access to smartphone or not. In such type of discussion there is a chance for each other to listen, understand and rethink their statement and learn new things that a person is unaware and conclude to support other person’s view. In such cases people learn from opposing point of view and realise what is right and what is wrong.
In conclusion, debates are always informative but people with a similar view will always come together to discuss and share each other’s view and understand interesting facts. People who have similar view can have a great interaction that will enable them to discuss more and more interesting things about their view and encourage a healthy conversation. However people with dislikes does not like to hear others views or are least concerned about other people views creates a havoc.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | kenbaker | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Gnyana | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | prakhar432 | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Ruthvik_542 | 70 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 58
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 73
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents However my recent interviews with childr 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... But when this person find another earth liking enthusiast then hey might talk fo...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...alise what is right and what is wrong. In conclusion, debates are always informat...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...w and encourage a healthy conversation. However people with dislikes does not like to h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2742.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 580.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7275862069 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53979972433 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.405172413793 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3513238873 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234259691991 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898616719164 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652747053795 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156483778326 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415327298124 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.