We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is known to us that different people have a varied opinions on things in comparison to other people. It might be due to numerous causes, like their upbringing, their past experiences, their beliefs etc. The prompt suggests that people can learn much more from people whose views they share rather than from people whose views views contradicts their own. In my opinion, I disagree with this suggestion for two reasons and argue that only when there are contradicting opinions there can be progress.
To begin, it is not very rare for people to bash heads due to their contradicting views and opinions. Only when this happens, there can be real progress in any area. What would happen if there are no new scientific discoveries disproving the already established scientific theories of many great scientists. Madam Curie was the scientist to discover radium, a radioactive element, which was highly unstable. Before this, it was generally thought that the elements were perfectly stable. So, if all scientists shared the same ideology in doing things, there would be little to no progress in discoveries and new learning about the earth. This tells us that people function in their peak condition in situations like these.
Further, a sense of competition is generated from contradicting views on things, which leads to trying to prove the other person wrong, which in turn leads to innovation and cheaper products. There is the age old debate of Android mobiles and Apple Iphones. If Apple had not launched the completely touch enabled Iphone 1, then the other companies would not rethink about the direction in which their research and development was heading, and would get complacent with their position in the industry. Since Apple did what it did, many companies started adapting to the rapidly changing market to cement their position in it. As this happened, there was a sudden shift in the types of mobiles people were able to buy. Also, competition helps in the coming down of prices of things, be it anything like digital services, electronics or even regular groceries. This results in entire nations and its people flourishing.
Of course some people think that when there are like minded people around them sharing the same opinions a lot of things can be done quickly. However, it might not hold good everywhere as there might be things which none of them might address while arriving at the conclusion which might prove fatal for some one. In Conclusion, contradicting opinions from the people around you can help make a better decision and a lot can be learned by both of them from each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | kenbaker | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Gnyana | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | prakhar432 | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Ruthvik_542 | 70 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant write at least 150 words 61
- The following appeared in a health magazine The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they d 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 58
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry In order to stop the erosion we should charge people for usi 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
... us that different people have a varied opinions on things in comparison to other people...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...us causes, like their upbringing, their past experiences, their beliefs etc. The prompt suggests...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: views
...hey share rather than from people whose views views contradicts their own. In my opinion, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... conclusion which might prove fatal for some one. In Conclusion, contradicting opinions ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...Conclusion, contradicting opinions from the people around you can help make a better decision and a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99086757991 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58519682706 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536529680365 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0123187976 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.095238095 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288506962145 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767516434002 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105855567364 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179147906125 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871211206633 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.