We can learn much more from people whose views we share than the people whose views contradict our own ; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Do we learn more from people whose views we share than the people whose views contradict ours? The speaker claims so. I don't think so. In my view we learn more from the people whose views contradict our views and also disagreement does not inhibit learning totally.
Disagreement makes us think about various prospects of a topic. It helps us in gaining a comprehensive view over a topic rather than a narrow one sided view. Lets take the example of latest petition against issuing of job visa to foreigners in USA. The native americans dont want this much amount of visa to be issued to foreigners. On the other side, If foreigners stop getting work visa they will not work in USA leaving native american deprived of global intelligence and competition.Here If you agree only with americans you will see that it is good for them that foreigners dont compete with them but on the other side it is also good that they compete and improve their growth.So disagreement with the view here is giving one wide view on the issue.
Disagreement helps in obtaining the shortcomings of a thought. For example take the debate where everyone is speaking about the each women should be given some privilege in am a male dominated society. Agreeing with fact is good but you will not see the other face of the debate without disagreement. The other face where women take inappropriate advantages of these privileges given to them. Hence this shortcoming is neglected.
Disagreement helps in improvement of thought process. If you disagree with someone it will branch your thought to some other direction, leading to improved results. Take the example of thought that children should concentrate more on studying rather than playing. But disagreeing with this thought help you in thinking about good effects of sports on children hence improving the thought process.
So praising the fact that disagreement doesn't inhibit learning I would not say Agreement doesn't cause any good. Agreement helps in improving the thought one is agreeing with. suppose we think of globalisation for the growth of a country . So agreeing with this fact doesn't do any bad to the country. But obviously disagreement gives you a wide field view of view.
So, Agreement and Disaagreement are like two edges of sword . Each of them have some acuteness to cut an object. Disagreement makes your thinking broad and your view wide Whereas agreement improvises your thinking. Both are helpful in the growth of thought process. But disagreement do it better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-24 | ratanpes16 | 16 | view |
| 2016-10-24 | ratanpes16 | 16 | view |
- a nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 70
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage the students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. 50
- Government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 58
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than the people whose views contradict our own ; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 16
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage the students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ntradict ours? The speaker claims so. I dont think so. In my view we learn more from...
^^^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...akes us think about various prospects of a topic. It helps us in gaining a compre...
^^
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ic rather than a narrow one sided view. Lets take the example of latest petition aga...
^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...w one sided view. Lets take the example of latest petition against issuing of job visa t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le of latest petition against issuing of job visa to foreigners in USA. The nativ...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...foreigners in USA. The native americans dont want this much amount of visa to be iss...
^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...top getting work visa they will not work in USA leaving native american deprived ...
^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
... of global intelligence and competition.Here If you agree only with americans you wi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hat it is good for them that foreigners dont compete with them but on the other side...
^^^^
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...t they compete and improve their growth.So disagreement with the view here is givi...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ages of these privileges given to them. Hence this shortcoming is neglected. Disagre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... So praising the fact that disagreement doesnt inhibit learning I would not say Agreem...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ibit learning I would not say Agreement doesnt cause any good. Agreement helps in impr...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ment helps in improving the thought one is agreeing with. suppose we think of globalisation...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Suppose
...oving the thought one is agreeing with. suppose we think of globalisation for the growt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lobalisation for the growth of a country . So agreeing with this fact doesnt do an...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... a country . So agreeing with this fact doesnt do any bad to the country. But obviousl...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...isaagreement are like two edges of sword . Each of them have some acuteness to cut...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'for example', 'speaking about', 'in my view']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251655629139 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.185430463576 0.157235817809 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0640176600442 0.0880659088768 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485651214128 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0706401766004 0.0444667217837 159% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.139072847682 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0573951434879 0.0406280797675 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76316470911 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0176600441501 0.030933414821 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0971302428256 0.0997080785238 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0154525386313 0.0249443105267 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110375275938 0.0148568991511 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2521.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 424.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94575471698 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316037735849 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252358490566 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176886792453 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11320754717 0.132149295362 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76316470911 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464622641509 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.7114510026 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1428571429 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.677023259 59.4972553346 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0357142857 141.124799967 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.321428571429 0.674092028746 48% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 5.21349557522 345% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 40.3787061995 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.47101449275 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222087439504 0.391690518653 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0749746383947 0.123202303941 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0781763427642 0.077325440228 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.457651601193 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171913214148 0.149214159877 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743778785695 0.161403998019 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144019221408 0.0892212321368 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.26546917072 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0790875532074 0.0692045440612 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16153026113 0.275328986314 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213944265649 0.0653680567796 327% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.