We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all.
Learning is a complex brain activity and as humans we are the most important learners of the nature. It is a very efficient way of learning to experience the theories directly. However, every learning does not have to depend on direct experience.
The history of human kind is full of very important theories, which are the product of extensive studies of eminent scholars. They led to a better understanding of nature for us and helped to develop our society. In order to further ameliorate this society, the new generations need to learn the important theories of the past in a short time period so as to build new ones upon them. Indeed, it seems wer are successful at this aim, since the development of the society continues to a great extent. The new generations doesn't have the option to directly witness all of the theories they learned but they can easily learn them because it is not contradictory to our mind. Learning process does not strictly require direct experience.
As an example, we can think about the improvement of biology in recent years. Many significant discoveries have been done such as the findings of Mendel about the hereditary mechanisms, discovery of the DNA structure by Watson and Crick, revealation of the genetic code of human beings by the colloborative activity many researcher worldwide, cloning of many animals done in many research labaratories, etc. All of the developments of biology are dependent on the crucial theory of Darwin concerning evolution. All of the recent theories, discoveries that are about to change the human society once more are built upon the evolution theory. In fact, no one including Darwin is able to directly experience the evolution theory. Nevertheless, this is taught to new generations for centuries, and those generations were quite able to learn and understand the theory of Darwin so that they were able to performs this quite significant progress in biology.
In summary, learning cannot be minimized to the conditions where we can have a direct experience with the subject. It is a far more broad process for humans that can be related to even about some theories which can never be experienced.
- We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all. 50
- Today it is clear that increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind 50
- Today it is clear that increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ries of the past in a short time period so as to build new ones upon them. Indeed, it se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... to a great extent. The new generations doesnt have the option to directly witness all...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...snt have the option to directly witness all of the theories they learned but they can easi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...ldwide, cloning of many animals done in many research labaratories, etc. All of the developme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...one in many research labaratories, etc. All of the developments of biology are dependent o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... theory of Darwin concerning evolution. All of the recent theories, discoveries that are a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, as to, in fact, in summary, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02754820937 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8747133964 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504132231405 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1639932843 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263789125422 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963606267757 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830805905709 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184216196448 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851547040888 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.