When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your Reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the Statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people think that the historical buildings should be completely preserved for our descendants, same as our predecessors preserving buildings for ours. Others people, however, argue that old buildings could be a different use than the past was used for. I agree with the latter statement and present the following reasons to support my point of view.
First of all, I would like to mention a museum located in Tehran known as the SAD_ABAAD complex museum where it was an imperial collective palace for Mohammad Reza Shah who was the last king of Pahlavi imperial before the Islamic revolution in 1978. The gardens and pompous edifices changed to a complex museum in Tehran after the revolution. It is a wise procedure to preserve a history, to be unveiling a history to people so that people itself preserve ours history buildings by means of buying tickets and helping to preserve taxes and outcomes. Contrastingly, if the complex was sold to someone such as billionaires, super-stars, and politicians, it was unclear that buildings could have been until now. In Addition, the UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) is responsible for overseeing the cultural heritage in countries, for example, the Golestan Palace world heritage in Tehran or Yazd city where is first old heritage city in the world. Therefore, heritage building serves as a bridge between generations and peoples, it begets us to preserve old buildings for next generations.
Second, the old buildings show a different living culture in all of the world. In Europe and most developing country buildings is a paramount paradigm to historic culture of people such as the Red Brick and mortar in England old building, the large garden house in the United States, and wooden houses in Japan. However, if you change a design and structure of an old building with a modern and new structure and uses, would have changed an old culture with a new one. Furthermore, you destruct the efforts of our ancestors that preserve structures for future, it is a ruthless wrong-doing to human beings. Thus, our success in culture, society, economy, and so forth depend heavily on the historical record like an old building that was preserved intact.
You might argue that the modern development could be useful for preserving historical structure. However, there are some disadvantages, someone who follows a modern structure and like it, could criticize an old building face and uses, and it there can be the continuous impact on everyone. Others might cite, by means of modern technology, we should change the performance of an old building with new one, for instance, it can be a coffee shop or Art gallery, and yet a cinema. This change due to the preserving fees is a lot and heavy to government and we should give the old structure to people. Therefore, the usefulness of old buildings weighs in favor of old building preserving bigots.
In summary, I believe, superiority over the preservation of historic buildings makes us a scrupulous carefree people. Therefore, I strongly support old buildings stand on ground that the past stands for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve old buildings for next generations. Second, the old buildings show a differe...
^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ings show a different living culture in all of the world. In Europe and most developing co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... makes us a scrupulous carefree people. Therefore, I strongly support old buildi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2633.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10271317829 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86404670105 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478682170543 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3283745012 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.380952381 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309068419717 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106783239454 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881074559433 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197649173202 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751191485118 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.