At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 145 million years. We do not know exactly what happened that eliminated so many species in a relatively short period of time, but there are several possible explanations.
The article states that the reason of eliminated so many species in the the Triassic period 200 million years ago has a several possible explanation, and provide the three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the theory may seems to not only be plausible, but is it not a good explanation to such prodigious extinction, and refutes each the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the mass extinction seems to be due to profound effect of The destruction of coastal and shallow-ocean species making by the fluctuating of sea levels. the professor refutes this point by stating that being believed fluctuation of see level has occurred at the end of the Triassic by scientist notwithstanding, animals and plants accustomed to this situation in gradual level; Nonetheless, this happening requires more sudden activity at 200 million years ago.
Second, the article claims that the SO2 released by the volcanoes caused to lower in global temperature and killed off many species. However, the professor contends that global cooling because of the so2 was in short time, and the raining could prevent to accumulation of the so2 in the atmosphere; although, the So2 is present in atmosphere now, it might not to be a reason to extinction.
Third, the reading avers that the plants and many animal died; thereby, asteroid impact at the end of the triassic period and blocking sunlight thereof. However, the professor opposed this points by declaring that dating of crater shown this Asteroids and impact occurred in 12 million earlier that those extinction time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...reason of eliminated so many species in the the Triassic period 200 million years ago h...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...reason of eliminated so many species in the the Triassic period 200 million years ago h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...aking by the fluctuating of sea levels. the professor refutes this point by stating...
^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed fluctuation of see level has occurred at the end of the Triassic by scientist ...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun animal seems to be countable; consider using: 'many animals'.
Suggestion: many animals
..., the reading avers that the plants and many animal died; thereby, asteroid impact at the e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y declaring that dating of crater shown this Asteroids and impact occurred in 12 mil...
^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this extinction' or 'those extinctions'?
Suggestion: this extinction; those extinctions
...act occurred in 12 million earlier that those extinction time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18217054264 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79829124077 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2102388853 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.125 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228944624456 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868923389513 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608329010475 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12473455014 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625144470939 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.