Being famous and recognized globally has been the dream of most youngsters. However, seeking such goals often distracts young people from pursuing long-term and practical goals. In the following paragraphs, reasons why young people should not seek instant fame are listed with examples.
The pitfall of pursuing immediate recognition is that such instant success are often transitory. As online media proliferate, it is quite likely that people will forget the once famous hype. Every day, people are fed with sensational news, youtube videos and even tiktok clips, and eyeball-catching materials are considered a norm rather than rarity. The "Canam-style" dance, which was pervasive globally a few years ago, are now oblivious by the public. It is quite likely that the such immediate recognition, even if successful, will not last long.
In addition to a myriad of media, the global trend is also fluctuating all the time. Under such circumstances, the only way to success to through years of dedication. Since no one can make accurate prediction of where the trend is going to lead, only those who are equipped with expertise and polished skills can achieve success in the long run. Because of such reason, for young people whose careers are just about to start, pursuing instant but ephemeral recognition are more likely to harm their future development rather than having a positive influence. Under such tendency, young people are more likely to emphasize on short-term but transitory success rather than dedicate themselves to years of rigid but boring training. For example, doctor has been a career that often lead to long-term success. However, the process of training a doctor usually takes several years of studying and internship. Without such training, people are not likely to develop a career that can result in long-lasting payback.
There are some cases in which instant fame and recognition can be beneficial. For example, immediate attention from the public can help an obscure actor to gain an opportunity in the audition. Under such circumstance, instant fame and recognition can be lucrative and essential. However, immediate fame are likely to perish. If the actor mentioned before does not perform well in the movie, it is likely that such opportunity is going to be wasted.
In conclusion, even though instant recognition from the public might be attractive, it should not be the main pursuit of young people, for such pursuit, even if successful, is going to be short-lasting and has a deleterious influence of their future development.
- According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeav 69
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29197080292 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.935512779 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7618294421 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8636363636 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245928927995 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748136209681 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575160182212 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14907767793 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497731201751 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.