The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The graph illustrates the comparison of unemployment rates in two economically developed countries of the world - United States and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
In the US the percentage of workforce had significantly decreased during the given period, but we cannot see the similar pattern in Japan, in contrast the rates had considerably increased between that time.During the first half of the indicated period the difference between percentages was approximately 1.2%, to be more precise, in Japan percentages had risen to 4.3 %, meanwhile in the US after some fluctuations the index has diminished to 5.5 %.
On the other hand, during the rest of the period the difference was becoming less and between 1998-1999 the curves indicated the same percentage-5.1% which means that the unemployment rates became equal.
In conclusion, it can be noted that even though most years the unemployment levels of these countries had differed, the percentages have gone hand in hand since 1998.
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problems 83
- The tables below show the students per lecturer and the number of students in various practice and lecture based subjects Summarise the information in the following three tables and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 90
- Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style effective Are the 85
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 817 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.171 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.99 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.888 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.556 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.193 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4