The table provides respective datasets of six cities by some of underground railway system characteristics such as beginning date, path lengths and the number of passengers.
As table shows, the oldest underground railway system is for London and because of its age, the path is extended more than other cities too. In terms of date of starting, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles are in second to sixth places respectively. Furthermore, the age of every railway system has direct relationship with kilometers of route but the only exception is Kyoto. On the other hand, although the railway of Kyoto is established earlier than LA but the length of LA train system route is longer than Kyoto.
It is obvious that in terms of number of passengers that are transported, Tokyo has the first rank. Although London and Paris railway have established earlier than Tokyo railway but this city has dedicated the first rank for itself. Furthermore, Paris railway system is younger than London but it has the second place among others. London, Washington DC, LA and Kyoto have third to sixth ranks respectively. By looking at table, of course Kyoto is older than LA in terms of its railway system but LA has more passenger transportation rather than Tokyo.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler 89
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter explain why you have moved describe the new house invite your friend to come and visit 11
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, look, second, so, third, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04739336493 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74157405458 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502369668246 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6488273663 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134769010812 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634030635999 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575822561291 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120285745374 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444523066693 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.