The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1987,1991,and 2001.
These three pie charts illustrate the proportions of yearly expenditure by a particular UK school.
In 1981, 40% of the school budget went on teachers; salaries. This figure rose to 50% in 1991, but fell again by 45% in 2001. Other workers salaries which accounted for more than a quarter in 1981 at 28% steadily fell to 22% in 1991 and 15% in 2001.
The budget for resources such as books declined from 20% in 1981 to 15% in 1991 and fell again at 9% in 2001. On the other hand the expenditure of insurance has reached from 2% in 1981 to 3% in 1991and it has risen in 2001 up to 8%. The budget of furniture and equipment which was 15% in 1981 dramatically fell at 5% in 1991 and increased up to 23% in 2001.
To sum up, based on these three pie charts we could see the downward and upward of the trends for different expenses by a UK school in three decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-11 | Diogo Silva | 89 | view |
| 2014-03-08 | adventurer | 90 | view |
| 2014-01-24 | rufik | 80 | view |
- adult education 40
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 70
- the amount of sport shown on television every week has increased significantly and this is having an impact on live sports events Do you think the benefits of having more televised sport are greater than the disadvantages 84
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 71
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the in formation by selecting and reporting the main features, and m 60
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 664 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.447 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 37 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 25 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.078 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.473 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.748 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.167 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4